Force required to slash through chain or steel mail

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the force required to slash through chain or steel mail armor with a sword, drawing comparisons to the force needed to shear an iron nail. It highlights that while the human body can exert over a thousand Newtons, the effectiveness of a sword swing depends on the concentration of force at the point of impact. The material properties of both the sword and the armor are crucial, as different chains vary significantly in strength and design. Chain mail is designed to absorb and distribute impact energy, making it more resilient than a simple nail. Ultimately, the effectiveness of cutting through armor is influenced by the geometry and material of both the weapon and the target.
Adam
Messages
65
Reaction score
1
In addition to the question in https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=12538 I have a few other queries related to combat.

I've read that the it requires about 900-950 Newtons to shear an average iron nail. I'm wondering how much would be required to slash through chain or steel mail armour with a sword, given that the links are made of rings generally about the thickness of a nail.

It's generally no problem for the human body to exert over a thousand Newtons when lifting at the gym, for example, but I'm not sure how much force is involved if we swing a sword and it is focused into that small area (the point of impact from a sword).

Ah, in general, I guess what I'm asking is, how do I work out the forces involved in the swing of a weapon of fist or such? How much body mass do I include, how much movement of the entire body is added to the speed of a swing, et cetera.

PS: The Momentum thread was kinda funny.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think that force is the appropriate measure. I think that pressure is more pertaining to the question.
 
A lot of what you're asking depends on the chain and the sword.

Chains vary in strength from gold wire which can be broken with fingers to massive chains used to hold boats in place which have links made out of steel several inches thick. Similarly, the material and shape of the sword is important. Is the sword a laser cutter, or a baguette?

Once you have determined the materials that you are using, you can start talking about how the chain is going to be broken.

Of course, there's always a question of geometry as well.

So, regarding your question:

Can someone with a bronze dagger use it to break a steel anchor chain? No.

Can someone with a claymore use it to bust a gold neclace? Almost certainly.

What you want to know about is probably somewhere between those two. In practice, sawing through chains is easier and safer.
 
I believe Adam was talking about chain-male armor, not a chain like an anchor chain. In comparing chain-male to a nail, I think the most important fact to remember is that chain-male is made to give way when struck, much like today's bullet-proof vests. So whatever amount of energy is required to bring your sword to a halt, that energy is spread out over a short amount of distance (about 1 or 1 1/2 inches), and a short period of time. This makes chain-nale armor much more resistant to breakage than a nail stuck in wood.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top