Electric field from concentric spheres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the electric field between two concentric spherical shells, each carrying a total charge Q. It is clarified that the electric field lines from the inner shell point outward, while those from the outer shell point inward, but the outer shell's charge distribution affects the field strength. The correct expression for the electric field in the region between the shells is derived using Gauss' law, assuming a uniform surface charge density. If the charge distribution is not uniform, a general formula cannot be applied. The conversation highlights the importance of assumptions in physics problems, similar to gravitational analogies.
tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
Two concentric spherical surfaces with radii R1 , R2 each carry a total charge Q. What is the electric field between the two shells?

I don't know what kind of answer they are expecting. Do I just describe it? Here's my attempt:

The field lines from the inner shell will point away from the inner shell towards the outer shell. The field lines from the outer shell will point away from the outer shell towards the inner shell. Since the outer shell has the same total charge as the inner shell, but it is spread out more over the larger surface area, the point where the field lines meet will be closer to the outer shell.

\frac{{4\pi r_1^2 }}{{4\pi r_2^2 }} = \frac{{r_1^2 }}{{r_2^2 }}
So the field lines from the inner sphere will be \frac{{r_1^2 }}{{r_2^2 }}
stronger than from the outer sphere. So the distance is <br /> \frac{{\frac{{r_1^2 }}{{r_2^2 }}}}{{1 + \left( {\frac{{r_1^2 }}{{r_2^2 }}} \right)}}<br /> times the distance between the spheres, closer to the outer sphere.

Is this right? Is this even the way I should express the answer?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
tony873004 said:
don't know what kind of answer they are expecting. Do I just describe it? Here's my attempt:
The field or the electrical intensity is a mathematical quantity, a vector in fact, and should be written as such.

The field lines from the inner shell will point away from the inner shell towards the outer shell. The field lines from the outer shell will point away from the outer shell towards the inner shell. Since the outer shell has the same total charge as the inner shell, but it is spread out more over the larger surface area, the point where the field lines meet will be closer to the outer shell.
The description is wrong.

Is this right? Is this even the way I should express the answer?
Not right, and no, you should express your answer mathematically. Read up on Gauss' law and fields due to charged shells.
 
Thanks, Shooting star.

Reading up on it, it seems that there are no field lines inside a shell. So would that mean that the outer shell can simply be ignored? Is the answer simply <br /> \overrightarrow E = \frac{Q}{{4\pi r^2 \varepsilon _0 }}{\rm{\hat r}}<br /> ?
 
tony873004 said:
Two concentric spherical surfaces with radii R1 , R2 each carry a total charge Q. What is the electric field between the two shells?

This was the original framing of the problem. Here, we have tacitly assumed (and the problem-maker probably implied) that the surface charge density on the shells are uniform. In that case, the expression you have given is correct.

On the other hand, in the problem it is only mentioned that the the total charge is Q on each surface. If it is not uniformly distributed on each surface, then there is no general formula to describe the field.
 
It wouldn't be the first time this book expected me to assume something. This problem reminds me of the gravity analog. If all Earth's mass were concentrated in a shell with Earth's diameter, gravity would be 1g on the outside surface and 0 everywhere inside.

Thanks for your help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top