Programs How important is to do Optics in a Bachelor's degree physics course?

AI Thread Summary
Optics is considered an essential component of a Bachelor's degree in physics, though its necessity can vary by program and individual career goals. While some students have successfully graduated without taking an optics course, a solid understanding of optics is beneficial for various fields, including experimental analysis and quantum mechanics. Knowledge of optics can provide advantages in research and teaching environments, as it encompasses fundamental concepts like wave propagation and energy transfer. Ultimately, the decision to take an optics course should align with personal career aspirations and the specific curriculum requirements of the institution. Understanding optics can enhance overall physics comprehension and practical lab skills.
go quantum!
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
The title of this thread speaks for itself, but to contextualize it, I should say that I am currently in the third (final ) year of my physics course and I have to choose some classes. Accordingly to the choices I have decided so far I would not do an Optics class in my course. Is that advisable?

Thank you for your time and advices.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I know Optics is a must for any Bachelor's degree.
For instance I just can't get the degree without taking a course of optics.
 
I got a bachelors in Engineering Physics without taking optics. It was an available option for us but not mandatory. It would depend on the school and program if you NEED to take it.

If you want to know if you should take it then that depends on your career aspirations.
 
It really depends on what you're planning to do afterwards, but I would advise you to take an Optics course.

I studied quite a lot of optics during my undergraduate degree, and for my graduate degree I went to another school, where there is no optics at all in the curriculum, so most people don't know any of it. While my research is nowhere near optics, sometimes it pops here and there, and I sort of feel a certain advantage over people who don't know it.

For example, the undergrad lab I was teaching has a lot of experiments on optics. I felt that other instructors had a certain difficulty in explaining them to students. (no specific optics knowledge was required for the lab, but it is usually good to know more than your students do)

Of course it also depends on what course you would have to sacrifice in order to take optics.
 
go quantum! said:
The title of this thread speaks for itself, but to contextualize it, I should say that I am currently in the third (final ) year of my physics course and I have to choose some classes. Accordingly to the choices I have decided so far I would not do an Optics class in my course. Is that advisable?

Thank you for your time and advices.

It totally depends on what you plan to do with your degree. While detailed knowledge of optics is not essential upon receipt of a BS (I'm not sure detailed knowledge of anything is), the concepts used in optics are very broadly applicable: energy transfer, wave propogation and interference, scattering, signal processing, etc. etc.
 
What exactly do you mean by "optics"? just advanced geometrical optics or also wave optics, quantum optics ? is is an experimental of a theoretical class ?
I am studying in germany, it's ab bit different here, all of the curriculum as an undergrad is mandatory, but I still don't think that you can leave it out, since it is an essential part of electrodynamics and you will get a lot of the results again in quantum mechanics.
also, spectroscopy is a major tool of experimental analysis used in many different fields. once you are in the lab and have to deal with it and you are not absolutely solid, at least in the basics, you got a real problem.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
6K
Back
Top