Human population verses time, fourier transform of that function .

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the Fourier transform of the human population plotted against time, questioning its characteristics, particularly whether it exhibits a strong exponential component. Participants explore the implications of treating the population function as almost continuous despite its step-like nature. The context of the inquiry is linked to a homework assignment, leading to a consideration of whether human population growth can be approximated as exponential over short time frames. Factors influencing population growth, such as resources and environmental constraints, are acknowledged as complicating the model. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of modeling human population dynamics mathematically.
Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
Human population verses time, Fourier transform of that "function".

Let the human population of the Earth be plotted verses time.

Assume that this function is almost continuous. What would a Fourier Time Transform of that function look like?

Is there a "strong" exponential component of such a transform?

Does the fact that the above function is acually a step function of time make the problem interesting?

Thank you for your help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Spinnor said:
Let the human population of the Earth be plotted verses time.

Assume that this function is almost continuous. What would a Fourier Time Transform of that function look like?

Is there a "strong" exponential component of such a transform?

Does the fact that the above function is acually a step function of time make the problem interesting?

Thank you for your help.

What is the context of the question? Is it school work?

And why do you want to take a Fourier transform of a monotonically increasing, bounded function?
 


berkeman said:
What is the context of the question? Is it school work?

And why do you want to take a Fourier transform of a monotonically increasing, bounded function?

Son's homework in a fashion. I was tired and drew a blank. The question was is human population growth exponential. For small time frames I'm guessing that a exponential function can closely approximate human population for some time periods, but in reality the function it is the sum of many "basic" functions of time? Thank you.
 


I googled human population versus time, and got lots of useful hits. Here's one:

http://desip.igc.org/populationmaps.html

Do you have the raw numbers? It's kind of like the game of "Life", I would think. Where it there is infinite food and no predators or disease, then yes, population growth would be exponential. But as you say, there are other factors...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top