Angle of Vector: Find Resultant Force & Direction

  • Thread starter Thread starter delfam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Vector
AI Thread Summary
To find the resultant force and direction of two forces acting on a car, the calculations involve resolving the forces into their x and y components. The first force of 406N at 17 degrees results in an x-component of approximately 388.26N, while the second force of 256N at -26 degrees gives an x-component of about 230.09N. The total x-component is calculated to be 618.35N, but the angle derived from this does not align with the expected results, indicating a miscalculation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of adhering to trigonometric rules and considering the relative magnitudes of the forces when determining the resultant angle. The final angle should be closer to 0.60 degrees rather than the initially calculated 30.65 degrees.
delfam
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


two forces, 406N at 17 degrees and 256N at -26 degrees are applied to a a 3400kg car. Find resultant of these two forces and the direction of the resultant force between -180 and 180 degrees.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


406cos(17) = 388.26, 256cos(26) = 230.09, 230.09 = 388.26 = 618.35N
arctan(230.09/388.26) = 30.65 degrees
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about the y component?
 
because it's a car and it doesn't move on the y-axis. I'm still not sure how to get the angle though.
 
delfam said:
because it's a car and it doesn't move on the y-axis. I'm still not sure how to get the angle though.

The car has nothing to do with anything. And changing -26 degrees to 26 was a nice trick, but you need to follow the rules because the next step requires the actual angle.
 
Does your answer make sense that the highest forces pulling at 17 degrees somehow generates a force vector that is 30 degress? Your answer is obviously somewhere between (17+26)/2=21.5 degree spread between the two forces. You have 1.58 times the force at 17 degrees than at -26 degrees, so you should be slightly higher off a midpoint mark (17-21.5 = -4.5 deg). So your answer should be above 0 degree mark at least, but not at 30 degrees! Your feasible region is thus between (-4.5, 17) degrees

Look at it this way.. if 17 degree force has (406/256)= 1.5859375 times more weight than the negative force, then your resultant should be around 1.5859375*17 + 1*(-26) ~ 0.96 degrees. Or more closely to the answer now, 1*17 + 0.60591138*(-26) ~ 0.60 degrees

You need to calculate all resultant forces and follow rules of trigonometry.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top