Mutual Inductance of the cylinder coils

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mutual inductance of two coils wrapped around the same cylinder, with a decreasing current in the first coil resulting in an induced emf in the second coil. The calculation performed yields a mutual inductance of 0.006818H, while the book states the answer is 1.96H. Participants agree that the calculation appears correct based on the provided values and formula. There is a suggestion to double-check the work and consider consulting with peers or instructors for clarification. The discrepancy between the calculated and book values raises questions about the accuracy of the book's answer.
Romperstomper
Two coils are wrapped around the same cylinder form. When the current in the first coil is decreasing at a rate of -.242A/s, the induced emf in the second coil has a magnitude of .00165 Volts. What is the mutual inductance?

What I did:

E_2 = -M(\frac{d_i_1}{d_t})

.00165/-.242 = -M

.006818H.

The answer given is 1.96H. I went over it several times and I keep coming back to this equation. Am I wrong, or is the book wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume the book's wrong, your working looks fine to me.
 


Based on the given values and the equation you used, it seems like your calculation is correct. However, it is always a good idea to double check your work and make sure you are using the correct units and conversions. It is also possible that the answer given in the book is incorrect. You may want to consult with a classmate or your instructor to see if they can confirm the correct answer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top