Real formula for gamma(deformation) in torsion of a rod?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formula for gamma (deformation) in the context of torsion of a rod, specifically questioning whether it should be expressed as sin(gamma) = rho*phi/L instead of gamma = rho*phi/L. The confusion arises from the interpretation of rho*phi as the arc length related to the angle gamma in a geometric scenario. The clarification provided indicates that the small angle approximation allows for the simplification where sin(gamma) is approximately equal to gamma when the angle is small. This approximation holds true when the length L is significantly larger than rho. Understanding this concept resolves the confusion regarding the formula's application in torsion mechanics.
KalShaen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Okay, so I'm studying for a Mechanics of Materials final at the moment, and I am reviewing the chapter on torsion.
I was reading through the given formulae, and I stumbled across one that I could not fully visualize (or simplify): the formula for gamma.

Based on my understanding and from what I know from before, shouldn't the formula:

\gamma=\rho\phi / L (for the deformation of a rod under torsion)

actualy be sin(\gamma) = \rho\phi/L ?

Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't we considering rho*phi to be the arc length of the end deformation, and considering that arc length to be the opposite side of the angle gamma in the pseudo-right triangle formed when the rod deforms?

I have come with two possible reasons for my confusion
1) The book is not using the sine function because the angle is very very small.
2) I am failing to realize what kind of geometric scenario is occurring between the angle gamma and the arc length rho*phi.

Please get back to me with a response as soon as possible so I can move on from being miserably confused! :P
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The answer is in your first possible reason. This is a small angle approximation, and actually, it is a very good approximation, provided the length L is several times rho.
 
Yes, nice observation, but as OldEngr63 pointed out, this is for small rotations. So sin(gamma) would approximately be gamma.
 
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top