Are undefined constants valid in trig equations when other constants present?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sduibek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Trig
AI Thread Summary
Undefined constants in trigonometric equations, such as when evaluating tan at odd multiples of π/2, lead to invalid results for certain identities. The identity tan(a-b) = (tan a - tan b) / (1 + tan a tan b) fails if either angle or their difference is an odd multiple of π/2. However, limits can be used to approach these undefined values, allowing for the calculation of limiting behaviors, such as tan(π/2 - x) equating to cot x. While informal calculations may overlook these limits for convenience, they remain mathematically incorrect. Understanding the conditions under which trigonometric identities hold is crucial for accurate problem-solving.
Sduibek
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
For example:

tan(pi/2 - pi/4) = (tan(pi/2) - tan(pi/4) ) / 1 + tan(pi/2)tan(pi/4)

Which of course comes out to:

undefined + 1 / 1 + undefined

Does that equal 1, or equal Undefined/No Solution?sorry for the poor formatting, I couldn't find the mathprint symbols for pi and fractions
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sduibek said:
For example:

tan(pi/2 - pi/4) = (tan(pi/2) - tan(pi/4) ) / 1 + tan(pi/2)tan(pi/4)

Which of course comes out to:

undefined + 1 / 1 + undefined

Does that equal 1, or equal Undefined/No Solution?


sorry for the poor formatting, I couldn't find the mathprint symbols for pi and fractions

Trig identities are only valid if the various quantities are defined. So, for example, the formula$$
\tan(a-b) = \frac {\tan a - \tan b}{1 + \tan a \tan b}$$does not apply if either of the angles or their difference is an odd multiple of ##\pi/2##. [Edited, thanks for catching that Curious3141]
 
Last edited:
LCKurtz said:
Trig identities are only valid if the various quantities are defined. So, for example, the formula$$
\tan(a-b) = \frac {\tan a - \tan b}{1 + \tan a \tan b}$$does not apply if either of the angles or their difference is a multiple of ##\pi/2##.

Okay, thank you!
 
LCKurtz said:
Trig identities are only valid if the various quantities are defined. So, for example, the formula$$
\tan(a-b) = \frac {\tan a - \tan b}{1 + \tan a \tan b}$$does not apply if either of the angles or their difference is a multiple of ##\pi/2##.

(Just to correct a small error, the expression *is* perfectly valid if either or both of the angles is an even multiple of \frac{\pi}{2}).

Whilst this is strictly true (for odd multiples of \frac{\pi}{2}), one can actually use the angle sum identities to calculate the limiting values of expressions.

For example, we know that \tan (\frac{\pi}{2} - x) = \cot x

We can prove this easily with a right triangle, but we can also view this as the limit of this expression:

\lim_{y \rightarrow \frac{\pi}{2}} \tan (y - x) = \lim_{y \rightarrow \frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{\tan y - \tan x}{1 + \tan x\tan y} where x \neq \frac{(2n+1)\pi}{2}.

Since approaching the limit, |\tan y| >> |\tan x|, the limit becomes:

\lim_{y \rightarrow \frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{\tan y}{\tan x\tan y} = \frac{1}{\tan x} = \cot x, as expected.

Usually, when I do rough work "informally", I don't bother with the limits, I just put the values as \tan \frac{\pi}{2} directly. But of course, I'm aware this is mathematically incorrect, just a convenient shorthand.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top