What Is the Formula for Hydrated Calcium Sulfate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Winzer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the formula for hydrated calcium sulfate, specifically CaSO4·xH2O, using given moles of water and anhydrous calcium sulfate. The calculations involve finding the ratio of moles and adjusting subscripts to derive the empirical formula. Participants also discuss a related problem involving the mass of water in a sample of CuSO4·5H2O, emphasizing the importance of mole ratios in such calculations. Clarifications are requested regarding the context of the initial question, indicating potential confusion in the problem statement. Overall, the focus is on applying stoichiometric principles to solve hydration-related chemistry problems.
Winzer
Messages
597
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have .021 moles of H2o
and .0137 CaSO4 annhydrous.

What is the formula for hydrated calcium?

Homework Equations


CaSo4*H20-->CaSo4 +H2o

The Attempt at a Solution


we divide .0137 by.021 and get .65.

We then multipy that by three and get:

2CaSo4*1H20-->2CaSo4 +1H2o
Right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oops that should be
2CaSo4*3H20-->2CaSo4 +3H2o
 
Here is another Calculation I have to solve.

What mass due to waters of crystallization is present in a 50g sample of:
CuSo4*5H20?

1 mole of CuSo4=159.61g
5 moles H20= 90.08g

Do I just take the ratio of h20 to cuso4 an multply by 50g to obtain mass of h20?
 
To my best knowledge, there are 2 types of hydrates:

gypsum or dihydrate: CaSO4.2H2O
hemihydrate: CaSO4.(0.5)H2O

But the question is really not clear.
Can you make it clearer.
What do you mean by this:

"I have .021 moles of H2o and .0137 CaSO4 annhydrous."

What does "I have" mean ?

What is the context of this question?
Is it a textbook exercice, then reproduce it completely.
Is it a experimental question, then explain more about you procedure.
 
Last edited:
If the question is related to an analysis of an unknown hydrate and the values you gave are for the constituent components, the solution is fairly easy.

Find the number of moles of each constituent and place these numbers as subscripts for each component. Divide both by the smallest number (of the subscript). This should yield the empirical formula. In the case where fractional numbers result, multiply both subscripts by an integer to remove the fractional value.

eg.


n moles of X and m moles of Y.

first attempt (X)_n(Y)_m
Using some numbers, 0.03 for n and 0.045 for m this becomes:

(X)_0._0_3(Y)_0._0_4_5

Dividing both subscripts by the smallest number (0.03):

(X)_1(Y)_1._5

multiply both subscripts by '2' to yield:

X_2Y_3 (the correct empirical formula)
 
Last edited:
for the second problem... you have to think in terms of moles...
1 mol of CuSO4.5H2O contains 1 mol CuSO4 and 5 Mol H2O
so 50 g of CuSO4.5H2O, which is (50/250) mol = 0.2 mol will contain 0.2 mol CuSO4 and (5*0.2)mol H2O

you nneed the mass of H2O present in the 50g...
this corresponds to (5*0.2*mass of 1 mol H2O) = 18 g

it's all a matter of proportion...
 
Kushal said:
for the second problem... you have to think in terms of moles...
1 mol of CuSO4.5H2O contains 1 mol CuSO4 and 5 Mol H2O
so 50 g of CuSO4.5H2O, which is (50/250) mol = 0.2 mol will contain 0.2 mol CuSO4 and (5*0.2)mol H2O

you nneed the mass of H2O present in the 50g...
this corresponds to (5*0.2*mass of 1 mol H2O) = 18 g

it's all a matter of proportion...

AARRRGGHHHH!
 
hey chemisttree... is there a problem in my way of proceeding with this calculation? then why you said... AARRRGGHHHH!
 
lol Kushal, I think he was just sarcastiaclly annoyed at the fact that what you wrote is exactly what he said lol ...
 
  • #10
aaawww... sry then... i may b stupid sometimes...lool :redface:
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top