Blackbody radiation frequency problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating properties of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) based on its blackbody characteristics at a temperature of 2.7 K. The maximum wavelength of the CMBR is determined to be approximately 1.0733 mm, with a corresponding frequency of about 0.280 THz. The intensity of the CMBR incident on Earth is calculated to be 3.013e-6 W/m^2. There is a clarification on how to interpret the total power incident on Earth, emphasizing that the intensity value represents what reaches each square meter at the top of the atmosphere. The conversation highlights the uniformity of the CMBR and its absorption characteristics in the atmosphere.
Benzoate
Messages
418
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Cosmic microwave background radiation fits the Planck equations for a blackbody at 2.7 K. a) What is the wavelength at the maximum intensity of the spectrum of the background radiation ? b) What is the frequency of the radiation at the maximum? c) what is the total power incident on Earth from the background radiation

Homework Equations



lambda(max)*T=2.898*10^-3 m*K
T=2.7 K
f=c/lambda(max)
sigma=5.6703e-8 W/m^2*K^4

R=sigma*T^4 or

The Attempt at a Solution



a) lambda(max)= 2.898*10^-3 m*K/(2.7 K)=1.0733*10^-3 m
b)f=c/lambda=(3e8 m/s)/(1.0733*10^-3 m)= 2.795 *10^11 /s
c)R =sigma*T^4= (5.6703e-8 W/m^2*K^4)((2.7 K)^4=3.013e-6
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Benzoate said:

The Attempt at a Solution



a) lambda(max)= 2.898*10^-3 m*K/(2.7 K) = 1.0733*10^-3 m

Hence, the relatively new field of "mm-wave astronomy"...

b)f=c/lambda=(3e8 m/s)/(1.0733*10^-3 m) = 2.795 *10^11 /s

I imagine they like to use "Hz" (Hertz), rather than sec^(-1), so this would be 0.280 THz.

c)R =sigma*T^4= (5.6703e-8 W/m^2*K^4)((2.7 K)^4) = 3.013e-6

So this gives the intensity of the "CMBR" in W/m^2. They're asking for the total power incident upon (the top of the atmosphere of) Earth, so you have one more step.
 
dynamicsolo said:
Hence, the relatively new field of "mm-wave astronomy"...



I imagine they like to use "Hz" (Hertz), rather than sec^(-1), so this would be 0.280 THz.



So this gives the intensity of the "CMBR" in W/m^2. They're asking for the total power incident upon (the top of the atmosphere of) Earth, so you have one more step.

So now I have to multiply the intensity of the "CMBR" times the area of the Earth in order to calculate the power incident upon the atmosphere of the earth? Nah, that can't be right since the total power incident upon the atmospher is only the atmosphere of the Earth ad ot the whole earth. Should I assume the area of the surface of the atmospher incident on is 1 square meter?
 
Benzoate said:
So now I have to multiply the intensity of the "CMBR" times the area of the Earth in order to calculate the power incident upon the atmosphere of the earth? Nah, that can't be right since the total power incident upon the atmospher is only the atmosphere of the Earth ad ot the whole earth. Should I assume the area of the surface of the atmospher incident on is 1 square meter?

The intensity you found is what is seen from everywhere on the sky, since the background radiation is (very nearly) uniform, so that value is what reaches each square meter of Earth. (We generally state that as "incident at the top of the atmosphere" since the microwave radiation largely is absorbed by the atmosphere in those wavelength bands and doesn't get to the Earth's surface.) I believe the question is asking for the total power over the entire Earth to stress the fact that this is really a small level. (However, radio telescopes are extremely sensitive and detectors responds to very tiny power levels.)
 
dynamicsolo said:
The intensity you found is what is seen from everywhere on the sky, since the background radiation is (very nearly) uniform, so that value is what reaches each square meter of Earth. (We generally state that as "incident at the top of the atmosphere" since the microwave radiation largely is absorbed by the atmosphere in those wavelength bands and doesn't get to the Earth's surface.) I believe the question is asking for the total power over the entire Earth to stress the fact that this is really a small level. (However, radio telescopes are extremely sensitive and detectors responds to very tiny power levels.)

Show I should multiply the intensity coming towards the atmosphere times the area of the Earth
 
Benzoate said:
Show I should multiply the intensity coming towards the atmosphere times the area of the Earth

I believe that is what is being asked for. Upon reading the question again, I can see how it could seem unclear, but I'm pretty sure that's the value they're looking for.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top