Calculating Velocity Using Work and Friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity Work
AI Thread Summary
A skier moving at 5.00 m/s encounters a rough patch of snow with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.220 over a distance of 2.9 meters, and the problem requires calculating her final velocity using work instead of Newton's laws. The initial approach involved setting up the work-energy equation, but the user encountered issues with negative signs in their calculations. After clarification, it was determined that the expression for the change in kinetic energy was incorrectly formulated. Once the formula was corrected, the user successfully found the final velocity. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately applying work-energy principles in physics problems.
rsala
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A skier moving at 5.00 m/s encounters a long, rough horizontal patch of snow having coefficient of kinetic friction 0.220 with her skis. the patch is 2.9 meters long.
what is her velocity after passing the patch?

problem must be solved by using work, avoid Newtons

Homework Equations


work = fs
work = K_{final} - K_{initial} =- \frac{1}{2}m v^{2}_{final}- \frac{1}{2}m v^{2}_{initial}

The Attempt at a Solution


let s be displacement (2.9m)

-\mu_{k}mg*s = - \frac{1}{2}m v^{2}_{final}- \frac{1}{2} m v^{2}_{initial}<br />

m is irrelevant, factor it out and cancel.

<br /> -\mu_{k}g*s = - \frac{1}{2} v^{2}_{final}- \frac{1}{2} v^{2}_{initial}

solve for v_{final}

\frac{-\mu_{k}gs+.5v^{2}_{initial}}{-.5} = v^{2}_{final}<br />

<br /> \sqrt{-2(-\mu_{k}gs+\frac{1}{2}v^{2}_{initial})} = v_{final}<br />

<br /> \sqrt{ -12.4952}<br />
cannot take sqrt of negative number.
i can't go beyond this part, is there a solution?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
<br /> \mu_{k}g*s = \frac{1}{2} v^{2}_{initial}- \frac{1}{2} v^{2}_{final}

Where are you finding all the extra minus signs?
 
in which part
 
rsala said:
in which part

All over. Look at your first expression for K_(final)-K(initial). That's supposed to be the difference of two kinetic energies, not the negative of their sum.
 
o I've messed my formula up =/
i got correct answer now, thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top