Griffiths Electrodynamics book: Electric potential

chingcx
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is from Prob. 2.25
Two point charges with separation d, P is a point at a distance z above the mid-point of the charges.
The last sentence asked if one of the positive charges is changed to a negative one, what is the potential at P? What field does it suggest? Explain the discrepancy.

Homework Equations


E = -grad V

The Attempt at a Solution


V=0 obviously
E = -grad V = 0
What is the reason behind that gives this result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember, -\vec{\nabla}V=\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}\hat{x}+\frac{\partial V}{\partial y}\hat{y}+\frac{\partial V}{\partial z}\hat{z} Since you only know V on the z-axis, you cannot possibly calculate \frac{\partial V}{\partial x} and \frac{\partial V}{\partial y}}. Clearly, any E-field will point in the x-direction, and so it is necessary to determine V(x,y,z) at points off of the z-axis to find \frac{\partial V}{\partial x} and hence E.
 
Last edited:
I had exactly the same question and I kind of understand what you are saying but since V is scalar and E is vector, isn't V supposed to possesses all the information that the three components of E possess? Would you please suggest me how you would compute E = -\nabla V in this case and compare it with calculation using Gauss's Law?

Thanks
 
The equation \vec{E}=-\vec{\nabla}V applies to V(x,y,z) (in Cartesian coordinates anyways). The potential you've calculated is actually V(0,0,z) (the -potential on the z-axis) and so you do not know how V varies with x or y, and you cannot use V(0,0,z) to compute E. If you wanted to compute E from the potential, then you would need to find the potential at a general point (x,y,z) (or even just a point on the x-axis in this case) first and use that potential.

In some cases, you know from symmetry that E points in the z direction and so knowing the functional dependence of V(z) is enough. In this case however, E points in the x direction and so you need to know the functional dependence of V(x).
 
Thanks,

I also have another question...
Two infinite parallel plates separated by a distance s are at potential 0 and V_0
a) Use Poisson's eqn to find potential V in the region between the plates where the space charge density is rho = rho_0(x/s). The distance x is measured from the plate at 0 potential.
b)What are the charge densities in the plate?

For this problem, I started with number of ways but none of them seem to be working.
 
You should start a new thread for that problem.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top