Potential inside a grounded spherical conducting shell due to point dipole

[JayKo]

Homework Statement

Suppose a point dipole is located at the centre of a grounded spherical conducting shell. Find the potential and electric field at points inside the shell. (Hint: Use zonal harmonics that are regular at the origin to satisfy the boundary conditions on the shell.)

Homework Equations

since the metal is grounded then only negative charges are left on the surface.

V(r)=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\sum\frac{q}{r}

The Attempt at a Solution

http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/classes/physics/phys196/ferguson/media/Image24.gif

i'm not sure the effect of spherical shell on the potential at any points inside the points, anyone can offer some insight thanks?

 

[gabbagabbahey]

You seem to be attempting to use Coulomb's law; but that is a bad idea. The dipole will induce some unknown charge density onto the shell...correct? How can you possibly use Coulomb's law when you don't know what that charge density is?

Instead, use the hint provided. Where does the potential obey Laplace's equation? What is the general solution to Laplace's equation using spherical harmonics? Think of appropriate boundary conditions and apply them to that solution.

 

[JayKo]

well, i just informed by professor the point dipole at the origin will have the potential of \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\frac{p*cos\theta}{r^{2}} inside the sphere (p=dipole moment).

the boundary condition at the shell is V=0. and i need 1 more boundary condition to solve the laplace equation, which in this case is the solution is of the form, (A*_{l}r^{l}+\frac{B_{l}}{r^{l+1}}) P_{l}*cos\theta. (the latex has some problem, but the way the theta term in denominator is not meant to be there ad should be shifted outside to be the nominator) just not sure what is the next boundary condition as i can't choose r=0 as the potential fx will blow up. any ideas how to kick start the next step, thanks

 

[jambaugh]

I don't know if this helps but consider that since the shell is conducting and grounded the field outside should be zero as should be the potential. Thus the superposition of the fields due to the charge distribution on the sphere and the dipole inside should cancel outside the sphere.

You don't need to solve for the charge distribution on the sphere explicitly you need only determine the component of the potential it must be producing to cancel the potential of the dipole. You can then use the fact that the potentials of both sphere and internal dipole must tend to zero at r->infinity. [Edit: Correction! Not necessarily the potentials but the fields i.e. gradient of the potentials must approach 0 at r->infinity.]

 

[gabbagabbahey]

well, i just informed by professor the point dipole at the origin will have the potential of \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\frac{p*cos\theta}{r^{2}} inside the sphere (p=dipole moment).

the boundary condition at the shell is V=0. and i need 1 more boundary condition to solve the laplace equation, which in this case is the solution is of the form, (A*_{l}r^{l}+\frac{B_{l}}{r^{l+1}}) P_{l}*cos\theta. (the latex has some problem, but the way the theta term in denominator is not meant to be there ad should be shifted outside to be the nominator) just not sure what is the next boundary condition as i can't choose r=0 as the potential fx will blow up. any ideas how to kick start the next step, thanks

Would the potential blow up at the origin if there was no dipole there? If not, then the blow up at the origin is due entirely to the dipole potential and so you can say that the potential due to just the shell must be of the form:

V(r,\theta)=\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}A_l r^l P_l (\cos\theta)

And so the potential due to the shell and the dipole is of the form:

V(r,\theta)=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{r^{2}}+\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}A_l r^l P_l (\cos\theta)

 

[JayKo]

Would the potential blow up at the origin if there was no dipole there? If not, then the blow up at the origin is due entirely to the dipole potential and so you can say that the potential due to just the shell must be of the form:

V(r,\theta)=\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}A_l r^l P_l (\cos\theta)

And so the potential due to the shell and the dipole is of the form:

V(r,\theta)=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{r^{2}}+\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}A_l r^l P_l (\cos\theta)

thanks for the help.
potential at the origin is zero if no dipole, i supposed.
good reasons, but here comes the questions.
since the potential is of the function (radius,theta) we need 4 equations (boundary conditions), and what would that be? the only condition i know off is r=R (at the shell) V=0.

 

[gabbagabbahey]

thanks for the help.
potential at the origin is zero if no dipole, i supposed.
good reasons, but here comes the questions.
since the potential is of the function (radius,theta) we need 4 equations (boundary conditions)

Really? Why would you need 4 BCs?

The general solution only has 2 unknown constants A_l and B_l (Which is the way it should be since it is the solution to a 2nd order differential equation!)

The fact that the potential due to the shell is bounded at r=0 allowed you to determine the B_l values.

Now just apply the other boundary condition V(r=R,\theta)=0[/itex] to find the A_l values.

 

[JayKo]

I don't know if this helps but consider that since the shell is conducting and grounded the field outside should be zero as should be the potential. Thus the superposition of the fields due to the charge distribution on the sphere and the dipole inside should cancel outside the sphere.

You don't need to solve for the charge distribution on the sphere explicitly you need only determine the component of the potential it must be producing to cancel the potential of the dipole. You can then use the fact that the potentials of both sphere and internal dipole must tend to zero at r->infinity. [Edit: Correction! Not necessarily the potentials but the fields i.e. gradient of the potentials must approach 0 at r->infinity.]

i see, well, is it possible to assume r->infinity, V=0. for the dipole? as i need to establish the boundary condition to solve for the coefficient of A.thanks

[you need only determine the component of the potential it must be producing to cancel the potential of the dipole] how do i determine the potential of the shell itself? assuming i get your meaning.

 

[JayKo]

Really? Why would you need 4 BCs?

The general solution only has 2 unknown constants A_l and B_l (Which is the way it should be since it is the solution to a 2nd order differential equation!)

The fact that the potential due to the shell is bounded at r=0 allowed you to determine the B_l values.

wait, i don't get it. A*_{l}r^{l}+\frac{B_{l}}{r^{l+1}} you see, when r=0, the terms blow up. anything to the power of zero is still zero.how to determine B_l ?

 

[gabbagabbahey]

i see, well, is it possible to assume r->infinity, V=0. for the dipole? as i need to establish the boundary condition to solve for the coefficient of A.thanks

The solution V(r,\theta)=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{r^{2}}+\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}A_l r^l P_l (\cos\theta) is only valid inside the sphere; the boundaries are therefor at r=0 and r=R not r=infinity.

In order to find the A_l's apply the condition at the shell V(r=R,\theta)=0. You still haven't actually used that condition!

 

[JayKo]

The solution V(r,\theta)=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{r^{2}}+\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}A_l r^l P_l (\cos\theta) is only valid inside the sphere; the boundaries are therefor at r=0 and r=R not r=infinity.

In order to find the A_l's apply the condition at the shell V(r=R,\theta)=0. You still haven't actually used that condition!

oh i see, i m left with determining the coefficient, A_l. i suppose the method is called Fourier trick by david griffith? right?

which means

\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}A_l r^l P_l (\cos\theta)=-\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{r^{2}}

and then multiply both sides by sin(theta)? and integrate it

 

[gabbagabbahey]

wait, i don't get it. A*_{l}r^{l}+\frac{B_{l}}{r^{l+1}} you see, when r=0, the terms blow up. anything to the power of zero is still zero.how to determine B_l ?

All the B_ls must be zero except for B_1---which corresponds to the potential of the dipole which is the only contribution which should be allowed to "blow up" at the origin. If any of the other B_ls were non-zero, you would have other terms where you end up dividing by zero at the origin.

The reason why the B_1 term corresponds to the dipole, is because of the form of the potential of the dipole

V_{dip}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{r^{2}}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*P_1(\cos\theta)}{r^{1+1}}\implies B_1=\frac{p}{4\pi\epsilon_0}

 

[gabbagabbahey]

oh i see, i m left with determining the coefficient, A_l. i suppose the method is called Fourier trick by david griffith? right?

Sort of, one method is to use a "Legendre trick" and multiply each side of the equation by P_m(\cos\theta)\sin\theta d\theta and integrate from 0 to pi.

But a much easier method is to notice that \cos\theta=P_1(\cos\theta) and simply compare coeffecients.

 

[gabbagabbahey]

which means

\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}A_l r^l P_l (\cos\theta)=-\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{r^{2}}

You mean:

\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}A_l R^l P_l (\cos\theta)=-\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{R^{2}}

where capital R is the radius of the shell, right?

 

[JayKo]

All the B_ls must be zero except for B_1---which corresponds to the potential of the dipole which is the only contribution which should be allowed to "blow up" at the origin. If any of the other B_ls were non-zero, you would have other terms where you end up dividing by zero at the origin.

The reason why the B_1 term corresponds to the dipole, is because of the form of the potential of the dipole

V_{dip}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{r^{2}}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*P_1(\cos\theta)}{r^{1+1}}\implies B_1=\frac{p}{4\pi\epsilon_0}

how you come about this equation?V_{dip}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{r^{2}}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*P_1(\cos\theta)}{r^{1+1}}
this is from the B_l term, i got it now. thanks
it should be this right?

V_{dip}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{r^{2}}=\frac{B_L*p*P_1(\cos\theta)}{r^{1+1}}

hence comparing it and we get =B_l=\frac{p}{P_l*4*pi*epsilon}

 

[gabbagabbahey]

how you come about this equation?V_{dip}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{r^{2}}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*P_1(\cos\theta)}{r^{1+1}}
i don't get it, as it is not the form of zonal harmonic. why?

It is exactly in the form of a zonal harmonic...

What is \frac{B_1}{r^{1+1}}P_1(\cos\theta) if B_1=\frac{p}{4\pi\epsilon_0}?

What is \sum_{l=0}^{\infty}\frac{B_l}{r^{l+1}}P_l(\cos\theta) if B_l=\left\{ \begin{array}{lr} 0, & l\neq1\\ \frac{p}{4\pi\epsilon_0}, & l=1\end{array}?

How is that not in the form of a zonal harmonic?

 

[JayKo]

Sort of, one method is to use a "Legendre trick" and multiply each side of the equation by P_m(\cos\theta)\sin\theta d\theta and integrate from 0 to pi.

But a much easier method is to notice that \cos\theta=P_1(\cos\theta) and simply compare coeffecients.

here why P_1=1[/itex]? isn't it = r?

 

[gabbagabbahey]

here why P_1=1[/itex]? isn't it = r?

<br /> <br /> From page 138, Table 3.1 in Griffiths (3rd edition), P_1(x)=x...so P_1(\cos\theta)=\cos\theta<br /> <br /> When someone writes P_l(\cos\theta), they mean P_l as a function of \cos\theta <b>not</b> P_l times \cos\theta...perhaps that is the source of your confusion?

 

[JayKo]

It is exactly in the form of a zonal harmonic...

What is \frac{B_1}{r^{1+1}}P_1(\cos\theta) if B_1=\frac{p}{4\pi\epsilon_0}?

What is \sum_{l=0}^{\infty}\frac{B_l}{r^{l+1}}P_l(\cos\theta) if B_l=\left\{ \begin{array}{lr} 0, &amp; l\neq1\\ \frac{p}{4\pi\epsilon_0}, &amp; l=1\end{array}?

How is that not in the form of a zonal harmonic?

ok,i got it now. B_l=\frac{p}{4\pi\epsilon_0} and that l=1 by comparing the power r on both sides. but legendre polynomial P_1(x)=x here how come B_l =1?

 

[JayKo]

From page 138, Table 3.1 in Griffiths (3rd edition), P_1(x)=x...so P_1(\cos\theta)=\cos\theta

i m using the same book and referring to it now.thanks. ok i got it. cause i misunderstand the bracket (cos theta) as times instead of function of cosine theta.thanks a lot.

 

[JayKo]

btw, a personal question if you don't mind? what you working as now?

 

[JayKo]

You mean:

\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}A_l R^l P_l (\cos\theta)=-\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p*\cos\theta}{R^{2}}

where capital R is the radius of the shell, right?

yupe,big R.
from the above equation, i come to this:

\sum_{l=0}^{1}A_1 =-\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p}{R^{3}}
right?

 

[gabbagabbahey]

yupe,big R.
from the above equation, i come to this:

\sum_{l=0}^{1}A_l =-\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p}{R^{3}}
right?

That doesn't quite follow...don't you mean

A_l=\left\{ \begin{array}{lr} -\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p}{R^{3}}, &amp; l=1 \\0, &amp; l\neq 1\end{array}

?

 

[JayKo]

That doesn't quite follow...don't you mean

A_l=\left\{ \begin{array}{lr} -\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{p}{R^{3}}, &amp; l=1 \\0, &amp; l\neq 1\end{array}

?

oh i see, cause i not sure when it is not 1, the A_l is actually 0.now i got it thanks. so basically that is the end of this question. thanks again. gute nacht