Is There an Error in the Angle Calculation for the Emergent Ray from a Prism?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a calculation involving the angle of an emergent ray from a prism when monochromatic yellow light is incident at a 60° angle. The refractive index of the glass is given as 1.54, leading to an initial calculation of the angle of refraction using Snell's law, which results in an angle of 18.94 degrees. However, the subsequent calculation for the angle of incidence at the internal glass surface suggests a value that exceeds the critical angle, indicating a potential error in the approach. The poster expresses confusion over achieving the expected result of 60 degrees and seeks clarification on their calculations. The thread highlights the complexities involved in prism optics and the importance of accurately applying Snell's law.
jemerlia
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ray of monochromatic yellow light is incident in air on an
equilateral triangular glass prism. This ray is in the same plane as
the equilateral triangular cross section of the prism; the angle
between the ray and the prism face is 60°, and the refractive index
of the glass is 1.54 for this light.

Find the angle the emergent ray makes with the prism face at
which it emerges. Illustrate your answer with a diagram.

The given answer is 60 degrees. The problem appears straightforward but it appears impossible to get the required result with the given data. Please check my solution and comment...

Homework Equations


Snells law: n1*sin theta1 = n2 sin theta 2



The Attempt at a Solution



For angle of refraction of the incident light - from air into the prism:

sin r = sin 30/1.54, r = 18.94 degrees

The angle of incidence upon striking the internal glass surface = 60-18.94

Therefore the angle of refraction - from glass back into the air:

= asin(1.54 * sin(60-18.94))

The difficulty is that the inner sin function gives a value > 1

Have I done something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
60-18.94 = 41.06 is greater then the critical angle. Now draw the ray diagram and find the angle of incidence of the total internal reflected ray on the prism face.
 
Quite so... many thanks for your help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top