Force of Gravity of Al on Mt. Everest

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force of gravity acting on Al at the top of Mt. Everest, the formula F = GMm/r^2 is used, where G is the gravitational constant, M is the Earth's mass, m is Al's mass, and r is the distance from the Earth's center. The correct distance r is the sum of Mt. Everest's height (8,848 m) and Earth's radius (6.38e6 m). The calculation yields a force of approximately 569.385 N, which is consistent with Al's weight at sea level, though he would weigh slightly less at the summit. The values used in the calculation are deemed appropriate, confirming that the approach to finding r is correct. Overall, the calculations align with expected gravitational effects at high altitudes.
thelightsare
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In this problem find the force of gravity of Al. Al is standing at the top of Mt. Everest at an elevation of 8,848 m. Al has a mass of 58 kg. The Earth has a mass of 5.97e24 and a radius of 6.38e6m. What is the force of gravity acting on Al?


Homework Equations



F = GMm/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


the dist. used to find F is from Al to the Earth's center ?
so r = 8848+6.38e6 ?
then plug in values

F = G 58(5.97e24)/(8848+6.38e6)^2
F\approx569.385 N?

Is this right? I feel like I'm missing soemthing
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thelightsare said:

Homework Statement


In this problem find the force of gravity of Al. Al is standing at the top of Mt. Everest at an elevation of 8,848 m. Al has a mass of 58 kg. The Earth has a mass of 5.97e24 and a radius of 6.38e6m. What is the force of gravity acting on Al?


Homework Equations



F = GMm/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


the dist. used to find F is from Al to the Earth's center ?
so r = 8848+6.38e6 ?
then plug in values

F = G 58(5.97e24)/(8848+6.38e6)^2
F\approx569.385 N?

Is this right? I feel like I'm missing soemthing
Hi, welcome to PF! Your equation is correct, but perhaps the values you are using are a bit off, since Al would weigh about 569 N at sea level, (more or less, depending on variabilities in Earth's radius, etc), then he should weigh a wee bit less atop the Mount. But in terms of significant figures, essentially, he weighs pretty much about the same on top as he does at the bottom.
 
Hi! Thanks you for the welcome and your help. And just for reassurance, for r was i right to add the two values together?
 
thelightsare said:
Hi! Thanks you for the welcome and your help. And just for reassurance, for r was i right to add the two values together?
Yes, the distance apart is measured to Earth's center.
 
Thanks so much!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top