Odd-Carbon Alkanes: Why Wurtz Can't Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter anigeo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The Wurtz reaction is ineffective for producing odd-carbon alkanes because it typically requires similar alkyl halides, which leads to even-numbered carbon products. When dissimilar alkyl halides are used, the high reactivity of organosodium compounds results in rapid coupling with their parent alkyl halides, complicating the reaction. Participants in the discussion emphasize the importance of understanding the Wurtz reaction mechanism before attempting to predict outcomes with different alkyl halides. The conversation encourages experimentation and deeper comprehension of the reaction dynamics. Overall, the limitations of the Wurtz reaction in generating odd-carbon alkanes are clearly outlined.
anigeo
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
why can wurtz reaction not be used to produced an alkane consisting of an odd nos. of carbon atoms?could you please explain me the reaction when i make two dissimilar alkyl halides react.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You really should try before asking.

Think: how many products are possible when you react R-X with R'-X?
 
@anigeo Try to understand the definite mechanism of a wurtz reaction with similar alkanes first. Then using that knowledge try to figure the answer out! Will be waiting for your effort.
:smile:
 
Borek said:
Think: how many products are possible when you react R-X with R'-X?

Generally, two different alkyl halides are not used in Wurtz reaction. This is because of the high reactivity of organosodium compounds which couple with their parent alkyl halide as soon as they are formed.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top