Vector Identity (del operator)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the transformation of the expression p^ (1/m)∇p to (m/(m+1))∇p^(m+1/m). Participants highlight the use of the chain rule in vector calculus, specifically noting that ∇p^a equals a p^(a-1)∇p. By selecting an appropriate value for 'a', the transformation can be simplified effectively. The conversation emphasizes the clever application of calculus principles to achieve the desired result. Overall, the exchange illustrates a practical approach to understanding vector identities.
racnna
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
i am completely lost as to how to go from
p^ \frac{1}{m}∇p
to
\frac{m}{m+1} ∇p^\frac{m+1}{m}
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In general, the chain rule should tell you that,

\nabla p^a = a p^{a-1} \nabla p

Choose an appropriate value for a and see what happens.
 
oh wow...nice trick
what-you-did-there-i-see-it.thumbnail.jpg
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top