Trig identities and complex numbers help.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying a phasor equation related to AC circuits, specifically the expression involving complex numbers. The user seeks to prove that the complex term can be simplified to a real expression, ultimately showing that the imaginary part drops out. By substituting values for θ, they confirm that the result consistently takes the form of a real number. They request assistance in formally proving that the original complex expression equals a simplified real expression. The conversation concludes with a successful demonstration of the proof using trigonometric identities.
Loudhvx
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Please forgive me as I may have to edit this post to get the equations to show properly.

I am doing some work with AC circuits and part of one of my phasor equations has this in it:
\frac {2i} {1+cos(θ) + i sin(θ)} - i,
where i is the imaginary number \sqrt{-1}.

However, knowing the physics of the circuit tells me the end result should have no complex numbers.
This means "i" should drop out of this part of the equation.

When plugging in values for \theta, the i terms do in fact drop out.

By plugging in numbers, I found the result is always of the form:
\frac{a}{b} ( \frac{ai + b}{b + ai}),
where a = 1 - cos (\theta),
and b = sin (\theta).
The portion in the parenthesis, obviously, always equals 1.

This gives me the result:
\frac {1 - cos (\theta)} {sin (\theta)},
which satisfies the requirement of having no imaginary numbers.

Using this in my general equation seems to work as I confirmed with certain specific cases for which the solution was verifiable by other means.

My question, or my request for assistance, is in getting a formal proof that for all angles:
\frac {2i} {1+cos(θ) + i sin(θ)} - i = \frac {1 - cos (\theta)} {sin (\theta)}.

I tried using some trig identities and even Euler's identity, but, unfortunately, my trig is a little rusty.

Thank you for your time in advance.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The math typing looks OK; what is you question?
 
I finished editing the post above, with my question.
 
Multiply and divide by ##1+\cos\theta-i\sin\theta##.

$$\frac{2i}{1+\cos\theta+i\sin\theta}-i=\frac{2i(1+\cos\theta-i\sin\theta)}{(1+\cos\theta)^2+\sin^2\theta}-i=\frac{i(1+\cos\theta-i\sin\theta)}{1+\cos\theta}-i$$
$$=i+\frac{\sin\theta}{1+\cos\theta}-i=\frac{\sin\theta}{1+\cos\theta}\times \frac{1-\cos\theta}{1-\cos\theta}=\frac{1-\cos\theta}{\sin\theta}$$
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you very very much! :)

and I guess I put this in the wrong forum. Sorry about that.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top