Newton's Second Law: Example Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on an example of Newton's second law applied to a system of n particles, where each particle experiences external forces. The equation presented illustrates how the net force acting on a particle, including interactions with other particles, relates to its mass and acceleration. A double summation is introduced to simplify the representation of forces among all particles, which can be computed by first summing over one index and then the other. The explanation clarifies that the double summation aggregates forces from multiple particles systematically. Understanding this concept is crucial for applying Newton's second law in complex systems.
Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
I'm reading through an example involving Newton's second law. The situation is that there are n particles surrounded by a system boundary. The picture consists of a bunch of circles (particles) enclosed by a closed loop.

The forces acting on one of the particles of mass m_i consist of an external resultant force F_i and other external forces which is given by \sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {\mathop {F_{ij} }\limits^ \to }. So Newton's second alw applied to the particle with mass m_i is:

<br /> \mathop {F_i }\limits^ \to + \sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {\mathop {F_{ij} }\limits^ \to = \frac{d}{{dt}}\left( {m_i \mathop {V_i }\limits^ \to } \right)} <br />

F_ij ~ force of particle with mass j on particle with mass i.

The example goes on to say that there are n such equations (presumably the one above) so to simplify they rewrite it as follows:

<br /> \sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\mathop {F_i }\limits^ \to } + \sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^n {\mathop {F_{ij} }\limits^ \to } } = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\frac{d}{{dt}}\left( {m_i \mathop {V_i }\limits^ \to } \right)} <br />

I don't know how the double summation works. For a single summation for example \sum\limits_{k = 1}^n k I just take k, replace it with one and repeat for all integers from 1 to n. The sum would then be S = 1 + 2 + 3...+ n = (n/2)(n+1). I'm not sure if the double summation is similar. Can someone explain? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First do the summation over j, then you have to do j summations over i :

\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^n (F_{ij}) = \sum\limits_{i=1}^n (F_{i1}+F_{i2}+...+F_{in}) = \sum\limits_{i=1}^n (F_{i1})+\sum\limits_{i=1}^n (F_{i2})+...+ \sum\limits_{i=1}^n (F_{in})


regards
marlon
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your explanation Marlon.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top