Electric potential & isosceles triangle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at the midpoint of the base of an isosceles triangle formed by three charges. A positive charge of 5.7 x 10^-9 C is at the top vertex, while two negative charges of 5.4 x 10^-9 C are at the bottom vertices. The user initially applied the principle of superposition but miscalculated by not accounting for the different signs of the charges. After receiving feedback, the user acknowledged the oversight regarding the charge signs. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering charge polarity in electric potential calculations.
Punchlinegirl
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
Three charges are located at the vertices of an isosceles triangle. A positive charge, of 5.7 x 10^-9 C is located at the top, and two negative charges each of 5.4 x 10^-9 C are located at the bottom. The lengths of the 2 sides are 7.1 cm and the length of the base is 1.3 cm. Calculate the electric potential at the midpoint of the base. Answer in units of V.
I used the principle of superposition. I found that the length from the charge to the midpoint was .0065 m and the length of the other side when the triangle was cut in half was .0707 m.
So V= 9 x 10^9 [ (5.7 x 10^-9/.0707) + (5.4 x 10^-9 /.0065) + (5.4 x 10^-9/.0065)
So V= 1.57 x 10^4, but this isn't right... can someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check your arithmetic, but did you forget that the charges have different signs?
 
Yes I did.. thanks a lot!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top