Calculating Probability of Simple Harmonic Oscillator in Phase Space

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Consider a simple harmonic oscillation in 1 dimension: x(t)=Acos(wt+k). If the energy of this oscillator is btw E and E+\delta E, show that the probability the the position of the oscillator is btw x and x+dx is given by

P(x)dx=\frac{1}{\pi}\frac{dx}{\sqrt{A^2-x^2}}

Hint: calculate the volume in phase space when the energie is btw E and E+\delta E and when the position is btw x and x+dx, and compare this volume with the total volume when the oscillator is anywhere but in the same energy interval.


For a given energy E, it's easy to see that the path of the oscillator in phase space is an ellipse of semi axes A and mwA.

I could write the semi axes of the ellipse representing the energy E and E+\delta E by A+\delta A and (m+\delta m)(w+\delta w)(A+\delta A) but I fear that would not be very practical... :/

I could then find an expression for the difference in area of the 2 ellipses as a function of x, differentiate that, multiply by dx and finally divide by the total difference in area of the 2 ellipses and I would be done.

Actually I already tried that with the case where only A was "allowed" to vary and not m or w, and it did not work. So I'm very much open to any suggestion!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top