Kinetic Energy in Racing Question

AI Thread Summary
In a racing scenario, a father with three times the mass of his son initially has one-third of the son's kinetic energy. After the father accelerates by 1.6 m/s, their kinetic energies become equal. The equations set up to solve for the father's initial velocity involve simplifying terms, but the current calculations yield an incorrect result of 0.359 m/s. Suggestions include reevaluating the equations to focus on the father's velocity and how the increase affects his kinetic energy. The discussion emphasizes the need to clarify the relationship between velocity and kinetic energy to resolve the problem accurately.
cd80187
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
All right, here is the question

A father racing his son has 1/3 the kinetic energy of the son, who has 1/3 the mass of the father. The father speeds up by 1.6 m/s and then has the same kinetic energy as the son.

So to being with, I set up two equations equal to each other, since the only unknown is initial velocity. I set it up as

(2/3)(1/2)(3m)(1.6)squared = (1/2)(3m)(v initial +1.6) squared

So to sum this up, I used 3m to represent the fathers weight in reference to the kid. The KE of the first half is multiplied times 2/3 because the increase of 1.6 m/s equalized the KE of the father and the boy, therefore the 1.6 m/s accounted for the other 2/3 of the energy. And on the other side, the v initial plus 1.6 m/s represented the final velocity that equaled the sons KE. I then canceled out the 3m and the 1/2 and graphed the quadratic equation, but I am getting an answer of .359 m/s, and that is not right. How can i fix this, and am I even starting off correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The increase of 1.6m/s by the father triples his KE, which makes his KE equal to his son's KE. The equation you wrote does not quite express this. Besides, you may not need to involve the son at first. Can you get the father's Vi just from knowing that Vi + 1.6m/s triples his KE compared to just running at Vi? And then you can use masses and KEs to figure out the boy's Vi.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top