Energy and Simple Harmonic Motion.

AI Thread Summary
A block of 0.30 kg is dropped onto a vertical spring with a spring constant of 470 N/m, compressing it by 2.5 cm before coming to a stop. The discussion revolves around using conservation of energy to determine the height from which the block was dropped. The equation incorporates gravitational potential energy and spring potential energy, leading to the calculation of the initial height as approximately 2.49 cm. Adding the compression of the spring results in a total height of about 4.99 cm. The correct approach emphasizes consistent definitions of potential energy and careful consideration of energy at different points during the block's motion.
sailordragonball
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
A vertical spring with a spring constant of 470 N/m is mounted on the floor. From directly above the spring, which is unstrained, a 0.30 kg block is dropped from rest. It collides with and sticks to the spring, which is compressed by 2.5 cm in bringing the block to a momentary halt. Assuming air resistance is negligible, from what height (in cm) above the compressed spring was the block dropped?

... I tried using KEo + PEo + SPEo = KEf + PEf + SPEf ... but, I can't get anywhere ...

... I found out that the frequency is 18.05hz and it's relative time is .056 seconds - and that's where I'm stuck!

HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I made a mistake ...

... I found a formula ...

... initial height = (2*mass*gravity)/(spring constant) ...

... but, there's the 2.5cm differential?

... what do I do?

Any help is gladly appreciated.
 
I'd use conservation of energy like you originally suggested. the 2.5 cm compression of the spring comes in there.
 
I tried that ... but, the lingering the final displacement of 2.5cm is messing me up ... I was wondering ...

(mass*gravity)(initial height + 2.5cm) = .5(spring constant)[(2.5)^2] ...

... your thoughts?
 
First -- decide where the potential energy is defined as ZERO. You can put this anywhere... but be consistent.

Then -- look not just at the point where the brick is released, and the point where the brick is compressing the spring, but also think about the intermediate point (when the brick first starts to compress the spring).
Think about that types of energy (PE and or KE) are at each location.

Finally -- make sure the total energy at each location (PE+KE) is equal to the total energy at each other location (PE+KE).
 
I figured it out:

k = 470(N/m) - given
m = .3kg - given
x = 2.5 cm ... but use 0.025m in the arithmetic
g = 9.8 - given
h = initial height

(mass*gravity)(initial height + displacement) = .5(spring constant)[(displacement)^2]

(.3*9.8)(initial height + .025) = .5(470)[(.025)^2]

2.94(initial height + .025) = .146875

2.94(initial height) + .0735 = .146875

[initial height = .0249m] or [initial height = 2.49cm]

Use initial height = 2.49cm for the remainder of the problem.... now find total height ...

... total height = initial height + displacement ...

... total height = 2.49cm + 2.5cm ...

... total height = 4.99cm
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top