Analyzing Forces on a Hockey Puck

  • Thread starter Thread starter reignofdragons
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
A hockey puck sliding on a smooth ice surface experiences several forces, primarily weight and normal force, due to gravity. Friction is generally considered negligible in this scenario, although some participants suggest a small opposing friction force should be included. The concept of "force of velocity" is clarified as incorrect, as velocity itself is not a force. The discussion concludes that the only significant forces acting on the puck are its weight and the net force, leading to the conclusion that the correct answer is AE. Understanding these forces is crucial for analyzing the puck's motion accurately.
reignofdragons
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A hockey puck slides along a horizontal, smooth icy surface at a constant velocity as shown.

Draw a free-body diagram for the puck. Which of the following forces are acting on the puck?

1. weight
2. friction
3. force of velocity
4. force of push
5. normal force
6. air drag
7. acceleration


Combinations of answers that were wrong

ABCDEF
ABCE
ACE

I've been at this for awhile and can't picture what's going on. Any help or suggestions are appreciated. Thanks for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which do you think are acting on the hockey puck? Never mind the answers that were rejected... what's your feeling as to the right answer?
 
sorry for posting in wrong section

Well...what i thought was

-a puck obviously has weight (1)
-since it's on ice, i think I'm supposed to assume there's no friction (2)
-it has some kind of velocity, so i believe there is a force of velocity (3)
-not sure about force of push...i think we're supposed to assume it's just moving on it's own (4)
-well since there's a weight, which probably means there's a down acceleration due to gravity, there's probably a normal force (5)
-air drag is probably negligible (6)
-not sure what kind of acceleration...since it's moving at a constant rate, i know there's no acceleration in that direction, but what about gravity? (7)
 
reignofdragons said:
sorry for posting in wrong section

Well...what i thought was

-a puck obviously has weight (1)

yup, 1) is definitely right.

-since it's on ice, i think I'm supposed to assume there's no friction (2)

I agree.

-it has some kind of velocity, so i believe there is a force of velocity (3)

But velocity isn't a force... there isn't anything I'm aware of such as a force of velocity...

-not sure about force of push...i think we're supposed to assume it's just moving on it's own (4)

yup... plus I don't think "force of push" is a real force of any kind... a force is a push or a pull... but a "force of push" sounds strange...


-well since there's a weight, which probably means there's a down acceleration due to gravity, there's probably a normal force (5)

Yes, there's definitely a normal force.

-air drag is probably negligible (6)

I'd say air drag is a force acting on the puck... might be negligible... but they haven't explicitly stated anything about it... so I'd say it is there...

-not sure what kind of acceleration...since it's moving at a constant rate, i know there's no acceleration in that direction, but what about gravity? (7)

Yes, there's no acceleration... the normal forces balances gravity... but more importantly acceleration isn't a force...
 
Even if the puck is on ice, I wouldn't automatically assume no friction. Otherwise hockey pucks could be tapped slightly and potentially go across entire arenas. I'd say include at least a small friction force opposing motion.
 
Help

There will be only Weight and Net Force acting on the puck. AE would be your answer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top