Pendulum Damping Force Calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the damping force of a pendulum using Stokes' Law, with specific parameters provided, including the radius, viscosity of air, mass, length, and time period. The user initially calculated the angular velocity and derived a velocity of 0.02688 m/s, leading to an incorrect damping force of 1291 N, which was deemed too large. After realizing a mistake in the viscosity exponent, the user recalculated the damping force to be 1.29 x 10^-7 N, questioning if this value is too small compared to the gravitational force. The conversation highlights the challenges of accurately determining damping forces in low-viscosity environments like air. Accurate calculations and understanding of the forces involved are crucial for resolving discrepancies in results.
geordieman101
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Pendulum Damping Force

Homework Statement


I am attempting to find the damping force of my pendulum using Stokes' Law. However, I am having trouble finding the velocity of the spherical object to get this damping force.
The radius of the sphere is 0.014m, the viscosity of air is 1.82 x10^5, the mass of the object is 0.035kg, the length of the pendulum is 2.3m, the time period is 3.274s
The pendulum was released from an amplitude of 100cm, at an angle of 23.5 degrees or 0.41 radians

Homework Equations


F(damping)=-6πrηv
v=rw
2π/w=T=2πr/v

The Attempt at a Solution


Using 2π/w i managed to get the angular velocity of 1.92rad/s and therefore my calculation for the velocity is 0.02688m/s, and thus my calculation for the damping force as 1291N, but this seems to be too large compared to the weight in the opposite direction of the force being shown via mgsinθ or in this case mgθ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1291N is ridiculous. Isn't the exponent on the viscosity of air number -5, not +5.?
 
yes it is, my bad, but this would give the damping force as 1.29x10^-7N, surely this would be too small compared to 0.14N is what I am getting for the force of mgθ, the force due to gravity also seems incorrect to me as well
 
I get the same thing for the damping force. Air is not very viscous. I don't see anything wrong with your g force either.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top