Work Performed by Force F on Body of Mass m up a Hill

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a body of mass m being slowly pulled up a hill by a force F, which is directed along the trajectory's tangent. The key point is that the term "slowly hauled" indicates that the body moves at a constant speed, implying no acceleration. This means that the applied force F must equal the sum of opposing forces, including friction and gravitational components. The work done by force F can be calculated using the height of the hill h, the base length l, and the coefficient of friction K. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
danilo_rj
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I've got a problem here from Irodov (it is a very well known physics book).
1.121) A body of mass m was slowly hauled up the hill by a force F which at each pont was directed along a tangent to the trajectory. Find the work performed by this force, if the height of the hill is h, the length of its base l, and the coefficient of friction K.

There is picture, but is not necessary 'cause the text of the problem is enough.
Anyway, I didn't understand why the body has no acceleration when it is being hauled by the force F. And why it is said that the body was slowly hauled?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Presumably, F is just the applied force needed to overcome the other forces acting on the body, not the net force. Assume that "slowly hauled" means no acceleration.
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

What is the deceleration of a snowboarder going up a 5.0° slope?
Replies
2
Views
13K
Why is the velocity at the cusp point equal to the final velocity on the hill?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Speed skier travelling up a hill
Replies
7
Views
3K
Car on a hill - reasoning for static friction
Replies
5
Views
7K
What are the forces on a wagon being pulled up an inclined hill?
Replies
9
Views
3K
For the friction formula when to use Fn(normal force)×mu and when F×mu
Replies
17
Views
2K
What are the forces acting on a child pulling a wagon up an inclined hill?
Replies
3
Views
4K
Car going up a hill. Find the Angle of the hill.
Replies
45
Views
9K
How do I draw a free body diagram of a car on a slope?
Replies
4
Views
6K
Calc Forces on Pulleys: 200N, 300N Masses, No Friction
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top