Why does the heavier car stop sooner?

  • Thread starter Thread starter scooby07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Friction
AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about why a heavier car might stop sooner than a lighter one on snowy or icy roads, it is noted that frictional force is independent of weight but depends on material composition. The conversation highlights that when both cars slide with locked wheels, their stopping distances are influenced by kinetic energy and momentum, which are proportional to mass and velocity. The key point is that while heavier cars may have increased frictional force, this does not necessarily translate to shorter stopping distances due to the relationship between mass and deceleration. Ultimately, the conclusion drawn is that if both cars are identical aside from weight, they will stop at the same time, as frictional force and deceleration do not depend on mass in this scenario. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of these dynamics in real-world driving conditions.
scooby07
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given two cars, one heavier than the other but identical in all other respects, traveling at the same speed on a snowy or icy road which one will stop sooner?

Momentum would say that the lighter car should stop sooner but how does the heavier car's increased weight in combination with friction figure into the stopping distance? Shouldn't the heavier car be able to dig into snow more increasing the opposing frictional force? On ice even though neither car can "dig in", wouldn't the heavier car experience a greater frictional force causing it to stop sooner or is the increased momentum greater than this increase friction?

Explanations are fine as are equations. Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One dependency is how much the angular momentum at the wheels is shifted into linear velocity. . .


p.s. this is a true driver dependency.
 
Last edited:
How about I simplify the problem.

Let's just say neither car has ABS and to stop both drivers choose to mash on the brakes and lock up the wheels.

So essentially both cars are just sliding blocks.
 
Last edited:
Frictional force is independent of weight, but dependent on material composition.

Momemtum is mass * velocity. p = mv. Friction will retard speed.

Friction uses energy directly. Kinetic energy(KE) is (m * v * v)/2.
So let us say KE = mK for this example. Friction will leave r*m*k units of energy to continue the work.

With one mass m1 and the other m2, the KE ratio, yields m1/m2 as the deciding factor of who travels the furthest. Example, if both cars are identical, then m1 = m2, and they both stop at the same time. This makes sense because you know heavier cars use more gas to attain the same speeds as lighter cars and since friction is independent of weight, the solution is complete.

The important point is at the beginning of this post.
 
Last edited:
basePARTICLE said:
Frictional force is independent of weight, but dependent on material composition.

Momemtum is mass * velocity. p = mv. Friction will retard speed.

Friction uses energy directly. Kinetic energy(KE) is (m * v * v)/2.
So let us say KE = mK for this example. Friction will leave r*m*k units of energy to continue the work.

With one mass m1 and the other m2, the KE ratio, yields m1/m2 as the deciding factor of who travels the furthest. Example, if both cars are identical, then m1 = m2, and they both stop at the same time. This makes sense because you know heavier cars use more gas to attain the same speeds as lighter cars and since friction is independent of weight, the solution is complete.

The important point is at the beginning of this post.

This doesn't make sense. Sliding friction depends linearly on weight. F = k.mg
where k is the coefficient of friction. If you combine that with F=m.a to compute the deceleration of the car, you'll see that THAT doesn't depend on mass.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top