Does Less Friction Always Mean a Shorter Braking Distance?

In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between friction and braking distance in different road conditions. It is stated that in conditions with less friction, such as icy or wet roads, the braking distance of a car is less than in conditions with more friction, such as rocky or sandy roads. However, there is some confusion about this relationship as friction is known to oppose motion, not acceleration. The question is posed whether a larger friction force should actually decrease the braking distance.
  • #1
eddywalrus
25
0
I was taught that in conditions where there is less friction, such as on icy or wet roads, the braking distance of a car, is less than if the car was traveling in conditions with more friction, such as when the road is rocky or sandy.

Although it makes sense intuitively, I recalled that friction opposes motion and not acceleration. So, for example, when a car travels to the right, and the driver applies the brakes, the car will still travel to the right, but just decelerate until it stops completely. Since friction opposes movement, and the car is still moving to the right when braking, then the direction of the friction force is to the left -- so shouldn't a larger friction force decrease the braking distance?

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Absolutely. Whoever said less friction results in a smaller braking distance may be in for some excitement if he lives in a northern state!
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
465
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top