Alternating source driving RLC circuit

AI Thread Summary
An alternating source drives a series RLC circuit with an emf amplitude of 6.00 V and a phase angle of +30.0 degrees. When the capacitor voltage is at its maximum of +5.00 V, the current through the capacitor, resistor, and inductor is zero. This means that the voltages across the resistor and the voltage source need to be calculated to apply Kirchhoff's loop rule. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the phase relationships in the circuit to determine the potential difference across the inductor. The participants highlight the need to keep track of signs and the relationships between currents and voltages at specific moments.
phyzmatix
Messages
313
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An alternating source drives a series RLC circuit with an emf amplitude of 6.00 V, at a phase angle of +30.0 degrees. When the potential difference across the capacitor reaches its maximum positive value of +5.00 V, what is the potential difference across the inductor (sign included)?

Homework Equations



I know for series RLC circuits the following equations are relevant

I= \frac{E_m}{ \sqrt{R^2+(\omega_dL-1/\omega_dC)^2}}

\tan{\phi}=\frac{X_L-X_C}{R}

The "E" used in the above equation is supposed to be the symbol for emf

The Attempt at a Solution



It seems to me that there isn't enough information to make use of the above equations since there are too many unknowns. We don't know what the driving angular frequency is for one and to calculate R we need to know I etc. I believe that there is something I've missed or am not aware of. Perhaps there's a connection somewhere I'm not making.

Please point me in the right direction.

Thanks!
phyz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi phyzmatix,

phyzmatix said:

Homework Statement



An alternating source drives a series RLC circuit with an emf amplitude of 6.00 V, at a phase angle of +30.0 degrees. When the potential difference across the capacitor reaches its maximum positive value of +5.00 V, what is the potential difference across the inductor (sign included)?

Homework Equations



I know for series RLC circuits the following equations are relevant

I= \frac{E_m}{ \sqrt{R^2+(\omega_dL-1/\omega_dC)^2}}

\tan{\phi}=\frac{X_L-X_C}{R}

The "E" used in the above equation is supposed to be the symbol for emf

The Attempt at a Solution



It seems to me that there isn't enough information to make use of the above equations

The relationship you have listed under "relevant equations" is not what you want to be thinking about here.

Here's the thing: the equation I_m = V_m/Z relates the maximum current and maximum voltage (between two points that have impedance Z). However, the time when the circuit voltage is at V_m is not the time when the circuit current is at I_m (unless the phase constant is zero, which means unless X_L - X_C =0).

Instead, for this problem you need to consider how currents and voltages are related at the same time. Since the R,L, and C are in series, how are the currents through them related at any instant? Since the capacitor voltage is at a maximum, what does that tell you about the capacitor current (because you know the current voltage phase relationship for the capacitor by itself)?

Once you answer that, you can determine the voltages across two other parts of the circuit at that time (the same way), so you'll have the voltages across everything except the inductor at that particular time. What do you get? Do you then see how to get the inductor voltage?
 
Hi alphysicist!

Thanks for your reply. :smile:

So, let's see if I'm getting this right. When the capacitor voltage is at a maximum, the capacitor current is zero (right?) and since R,L and C are in series, then the current through R and L will also be zero?
 
phyzmatix said:
Hi alphysicist!

Thanks for your reply. :smile:

So, let's see if I'm getting this right. When the capacitor voltage is at a maximum, the capacitor current is zero (right?) and since R,L and C are in series, then the current through R and L will also be zero?

Yes, and also the current through the AC voltage source will be zero. So you'll need to find the voltage across the resistor and voltage source at that moment in time, and then you can apply Kirchoff's loop rule. Just be sure to keep track of the signs. (For example, for the voltage source, what are the general time dependent functions for the current and voltage? Once you write those down with the given information, you'll have two equations in two unknowns.)

I won't be able to respond any more for the next several days; I'm going out of town in just a few hours from now. (So if you do have any questions I'm not ignoring you or anything.)
 
alphysicist said:
Yes, and also the current through the AC voltage source will be zero. So you'll need to find the voltage across the resistor and voltage source at that moment in time, and then you can apply Kirchoff's loop rule. Just be sure to keep track of the signs. (For example, for the voltage source, what are the general time dependent functions for the current and voltage? Once you write those down with the given information, you'll have two equations in two unknowns.)

I won't be able to respond any more for the next several days; I'm going out of town in just a few hours from now. (So if you do have any questions I'm not ignoring you or anything.)

You'll probably only get this once you're back now, but thank you for your help, it made a huge difference!

Hope your trip is/was very enjoyable :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top