Why doesn't the Moon fall to Earth despite gravitational attraction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tianyi.tan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
The Moon does not fall to Earth because it is in constant free fall towards the Earth while also moving sideways at a sufficient speed, creating an orbit. If the Moon were released without any tangential velocity, it would fall directly to Earth instead of orbiting. The gravitational force acting on the Moon is always perpendicular to its motion, maintaining its circular path. For the neutron star problem, the fastest rotation rate can be calculated using centripetal acceleration and gravitational force equations, leading to a tangential speed of approximately 1.152 x 10^8 m/s. This results in about 917 revolutions per second for the outer particles of the neutron star.
tianyi.tan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello.. some stuff from my tutorial I'm confused about, pls help! thanks:)
1) Why does the moon not fall and hit the earth? Since both exert attractive forces on each other, there should be some kind of acceleration towards a common point.. ><
2)When the Earth and moon are held at rest at their present separation and released to move, would the moon orbit the earth? Or would it then fall to the earth?
3) "Despite its mass and size, a typical neutron star can rotate about its own axis at a high speed. What is the fastest rate of rotation of a neutron star such that matter still remains at its surface? Assume that the radius of the neutron star is 20.0km & its mass is 3.98 x 10^30kg." What concepts should I use to solve this problem? thanks :D:D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. They are constantly falling (being accelerated) toward each other. But they are also moving sideways wrt each other - fast enough that they never hit each other. That's what an orbit is.

2. If they had no tangential velocity, they would fall straight together like a ball dropped straight down from your hand. But they have a tangential velocity, like a ball thrown sideways with respect to the earth.

3. Are these homework? Did you learn about centripedal acceleration yet? There is an equation for it...
 
hi, thanks so much!
regarding (3), yupp I have learned about centripetal acceleration, but I'm not sure what they mean by the matter staying on the surface. Am I supposed to equate v2/r to the gravitational field strength? :S
 
tianyi.tan said:
Hello.. some stuff from my tutorial I'm confused about, pls help! thanks:)
1) Why does the moon not fall and hit the earth? Since both exert attractive forces on each other, there should be some kind of acceleration towards a common point.. ><
2)When the Earth and moon are held at rest at their present separation and released to move, would the moon orbit the earth? Or would it then fall to the earth?
3) "Despite its mass and size, a typical neutron star can rotate about its own axis at a high speed. What is the fastest rate of rotation of a neutron star such that matter still remains at its surface? Assume that the radius of the neutron star is 20.0km & its mass is 3.98 x 10^30kg." What concepts should I use to solve this problem? thanks :D:D

1. The force of attraction is perpendicular to the velocity of the moon's orbit - ie the moon is traveling tangential to the orbit, assuming a circular orbit. Thus there is no component of the force in the direction of motion. The force remains perpendicular to the motion as it moves so it simply changes the direction of the moon's motion. This is an example of uniform circular motion. The acceleration is always directed towards the centre of the Earth (approximately) no matter where the moon is.

2. In this case the moon would move straight towards the Earth because it does not have an initial motion perpendicular to the gravitational force.

3. We know
a=\frac{GM}{r} (Newton's Law of Gravitation)

and a = \frac{v^{2}}{r} (centripetal acceleration)

thus

\frac{Gm}{r^{2}} = \frac{v^{2}}{r}

v= \sqrt{\frac{Gm}{r}} gives the tangential speed of the particles

= \sqrt{\frac{6.67e-11*3.98e30}{20e3}}

= 1.152 *10^8 m/s

This is the tangential speed of the outer particles, assuming the star's mass is concentrated at its centre.

Circumfrence = 2pir = 1.257 * 10^5m

Thus 1.152 *10^8/1.257 * 10^5 = 917 revolutions per second required.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top