Nearsightedness, Refractive Power, Optics

  • Thread starter Thread starter yayirunin2car
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics Power
AI Thread Summary
The patient has a refractive power of 50.1 diopters, indicating nearsightedness. The discussion revolves around calculating the far point using the lens formula, where the distance from the lens to the retina is 2.40 cm. There is confusion regarding the sign conventions for object distance (d0) and image distance (di), particularly whether di should be positive or negative. The correct approach involves recognizing that di is negative since the image is formed in front of the lens for a nearsighted person. Clarification is needed on translating the problem statement into appropriate values for d0, di, and f to solve the problem accurately.
yayirunin2car
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The relaxed eyes of a patient have a refractive power of 50.1 diopters. (For the purposes of this problem, treat the eye as a single-lens system, with the retina 2.40 cm from the lens.)
(a) Is the patient nearsighted or farsighted? (b) If the patient is nearsighted, find the far point. If this person is farsighted, find the near point.

Homework Equations



1/f = 1/d0 + 1/di

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the person is nearsighted.

I guess where I'm going wrong is by thinking that the lens is a pair of glasses 2.40 cm in front of the eye, which is all the problems I have done so far. I have been using 1/50.1 to get f and converting it to centimeters where f = 1.9960 cm.

What I use to get my answer:
F is the far point.

1/f = 1/infinity + 1/(F-2.40)

The answer I get, 4.3960 cm is wrong. Also, when I make di negative since it should be in front of the eye, I get .4039 which is also wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
d0 and di refer to the distance of the object or image (respectively to the lens)

1. Since the image is to be focused on the retina, that means di=___?
2. d0 is not infinity for an object located at the far point.
3. And as you said, f=1.996 cm.
 
If I take di as 2.4, should I make it negative since it is in front of the lense?

Thank you for your help!
 
so is 'di' positive because it is behind the lens?
Or were you just correcting him, and 'di' is negative because it is behind the lens?
thanks.
 
It's like a standard lens problem, with do and di on opposite sides of the lens, so both are positive. The problem is in translating from the description in the problem statement into values for do, di, and f.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top