Asking recommendation for solid state books

AI Thread Summary
For those new to solid state physics seeking alternatives to Kittel, several recommendations emerge. Ashcroft & Mermin is noted for its dryness, similar to Kittel, despite the field's rich applications. Yu & Cardona is highlighted as an excellent resource for semiconductor topics, complementing Ashcroft & Mermin's coverage. Ziman's works are suggested for their accessible explanations, offering insights into the subject without rigorous complexity. Additionally, older texts by Slater and Seitz are praised for their clarity and depth, providing a historical perspective that enhances understanding of modern developments in solid state physics. Overall, while many standard texts may lack motivation, there are valuable resources available that can enrich the learning experience.
runninglow
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
i am new to solid state physics.i have tried kittel already.i found it pretty boring.can anybody suggest any other book on this subject?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ashcroft & Mermin, Callaway, Yu & Cardona, Madelung and a whole bunch more...

http://browse.barnesandnoble.com/browse/nav.asp?visgrp=nonfiction&N=170482&Ne=170159+170482
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree that Kittel is pretty dry, but so is Ashcroft & Mermin - for a field that is so rich with applications, it's odd that the "standard" texts are so lacking in motivation. I've not read Yu & Cardona or Madelung, so I can't speak for those.
 
Another couple of good books were written by Ziman, they are not rigorous, but when you sit down and actually read the text around his derivations you'll get a sense of what is actually going on in a solid.

Yu and Cardona hits semiconductors hard and is a great compliment to Ashcroft and Mermin who doesn't really touch them at all. Kittel has a decent mix, but is really the standard along with A&M.

Solid state is full of pick and shovel work, you have to deal with the dry intros out there, but after the fact you can do some really good work. Another good place to start is go back to the really old stuff, Slater or Seitz, they really knew how to write good books and you'll really get an appreciation for how far the subject has come.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
178
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top