Help with calculating the range of error accleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the range of error in acceleration for a cart rolling down an inclined plane, using Newton's second law. The user seeks to derive the error in acceleration (\Delta a) based on the average deviation in time (\Delta t) while treating displacement (d) as exact. They initially proposed an equation for \Delta a but found it unsatisfactory, later refining it to \Delta a = a(\frac{\Delta d}{d} + \frac{2\Delta t}{t}), which was confirmed as correct. Additionally, they clarified graphing conventions, noting that acceleration should be plotted on the y-axis with mass or sin on the x-axis. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurate error calculations in experimental physics.
Digitalx04
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Motion on an Incline. I did an experiment where I measured the acceleration of a cart rolling down an inclined plane using 5 different angles and comparing them to those predicted in Newton's 2nd law of motion.

I am trying to figure out the equation I can use to find the \Deltaa using the average deviation in the time as \Deltat. I am treating d (the displacement of the car I used in the experiment) as an exact measurement.

Homework Equations


I used d = \frac{1}{2}at^2 in a previous experiment and solving for a again would yield me a = \frac{2d}{t^2}. I figured I could use this same derivation to solve for \Deltaa which may or may not be my problem.

I also know by Newton's 2nd law that \vec{F}= m\bar{a} and that that a = g sin\theta

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried the range of error for a = \frac{2d}{t^2} coming out with :
\Deltaa = 2\Deltad/\Deltat^2 but this dosn't seem right. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After some more fiddling I came up with a new equation for \Deltaa being:

\Deltaa = a(\frac{\Delta d}{d} + \frac{2\Delta t}{t})

Would this be the correct formula?
 
Yes, that's right.

p.s. welcome to Physics Forums.
 
Thanks a lot,one more question. When I am doing these graphs it asks me to plot acceleration as a function of mass and another graph of my experimental acceleration as a function of sin. This means that my x-axis for both of these should be my acceleration and my y-axis the dependent variable of sin or mass in each different graph correct?
 
By convention, we usually graph y as a function of x. So a would be along the y-axis in both cases.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top