Rotating steel wire with bead on it

AI Thread Summary
A bead with a mass of 100 g slides along a rotating semicircular steel wire of radius 10 cm, rotating at 2 revolutions per second. The discussion focuses on the forces acting on the bead, including centripetal force, gravity, and the normal force. It is clarified that the bead cannot remain motionless relative to the wire due to the absence of an upward force component, leading to acceleration. The forces must be resolved into components to determine the conditions for the bead's motion. A visual representation is suggested to better understand the forces involved.
mrdoe
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A small bead with a mass of 100 g slides without friction along a rotating semicircular steel wire, where the semicircle has radius 10cm. The steel wire rotates about a vertical axis at a rate of 2 revolutions per second. Find the positions at which the bead will be motionless relative to the rotating steel wire, if the bead is in the lower half of the semicircle. Gravity points in the direction of the steel wire's axis. All surfaces are frictionless.

2. The attempt at a solution

We have the centripetal force which is in the horizontal direction to the left, which is $\dfrac{mv^2}{r} = 16000\pi^2$. We also have the velocity in the forwards direction, which is not accelerating (?) so there's no force, right? We also have the combined force of gravity and the normal force, which is $100g\sin\theta$, where $\theta$ is the counterclockwise angle from the down direction. But I don't see any force having any component pointing upwards! How does the bead stay motionless!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You only have two forces, gravity and normal force. The sum of these two, the net force, is directed towards the center that is why is called "centripetal", but it is not a force in itself. Draw a free body of the bead in the lower half of the wire. The normal force has a centripetal component and a vertical component. The bead does not stay motionless! It accelerates.
 
However, the only vertical upward force is the vertical component of the normal force, which is there whether the centripetal force is there or not. Then if there were no centripetal acceleration, the bead would fall to the bottom anyways, so it can't stay motionless with respect to the steel wire, right?
 
I don't think I've gone into enough detail, so I'll provide a picture, which will help a lot.

This should clear up any misunderstanding.

http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/3598/physicsproblem.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When the wire rotates about its vertical axis, it will be pushing the bead towards the axis horizontally. It is centripetal force Fc. The bead will push the wire with Fc horizontally away from the axis. Resolve this force into two components. One along the radius, and another tangential to the wire.
Similarly resolve the weight of the bead into two components.
Then you can find the condition for the motionless bead.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top