Tension in cables pulling a box

AI Thread Summary
A 400-kg box is lifted with constant velocity using two cables at a 40-degree angle, leading to a calculation of tension in each cable. The net force is zero due to constant velocity, so the equation must balance the weight of the box with the vertical components of the tension. The confusion arose from incorrectly including a normal force, which is not present since the box is not in contact with a surface. Once the normal force was removed from consideration, the correct tension of 2560 N was confirmed. Understanding that the normal force only applies when an object is in contact with a surface clarified the solution.
oceanflavored
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 400-kg box is lifted vertically upward with constant velocity by means of two cables pulling at 40.0o on either side of the vertical direction. What is the tension in each cable?

Homework Equations


Force = mass(acceleration)
Weight = mass(gravity)

The Attempt at a Solution


My free-body diagram had the two forces: one west of north, the other east of north; the normal force pointing in the upward vertical direction; and the weight pointing in the downward vertical direction.
Then, I reasoned that since the box was moving with constant velocity, the acceleration would be zero, meaning the net force would be zero:
So, net force = 2(F cos 40.0o) + N - W = 0
The problem with this equation of mine is that my normal force and weight cancel out, leaving me with 2(F cos 40.0o) = 0, which doesn't exactly give me an answer.

The book says the answer is 2560 N. Please tell me what I'm doing wrong :|
Thank you so much!

PS: All the people on this site are LIFESAVERS :) I'm pretty sure if I get a 100 on my test next Friday, it's because of all the people who keep answering my questions, so THANK YOU! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You added a force that's not there. Since the box is being pulled by the strings, there is gravity downwards and the tensions on the strings that cancel it. So just get that extra force out and see if it works.
 


Thank you so much :)

That did work, but I'm still confused, as to why there wouldn't be a normal force pointing upwards? I always thought that if weight is pointing downwards, there would always be the normal force (the reaction force) pointing upwards?? :|
 


Well the normal force is a force perpendicular (normal) to the surface of contact. For example if the box was just sitting on the ground, then you would have a normal force equal to the weight of the box acting up.
In your question the box was being lifted up, so it's not touching the ground.
 


GOT IT :)))))))))

Thank you SO SO SO SO much! :D
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top