Block on inclined plane acceleration without rotating coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an inclined plane problem without rotating the coordinate system, specifically finding the acceleration components of a block on an incline at angle Θ. The user attempts to derive the acceleration in both x and y directions but encounters incorrect results, particularly with the x-component of the normal force. They express confusion over the calculations, noting that their derived acceleration components do not match the expected values from the rotated coordinate approach. A response highlights a mistake in calculating the normal force's components, emphasizing that the normal force is angled with respect to the vertical rather than the horizontal. The user seeks clarification on their errors to achieve the correct magnitude of acceleration.
brainpushups
Messages
452
Reaction score
195

Homework Statement


I was doing this for fun, but this seemed like the right place to post. Typically inclined plane problems are solved by rotating the coordinate system so the x-axis is along the plane. I decided to try solving the problem without rotating the coordinates. In this case there should be acceleration in the x and y direction, and the magnitude of the acceleration vector should return the same value as the problem solved with rotating the coordinates. My attempts at solving the problem with "normal" coordinates have been incorrect and I'd appreciate any insight as to what I'm doing wrong.

If I need to state the problem than here it is: A block mass m is on an inclined plane at angle \Theta. Find components of the acceleration of the block without rotating the coordinates and also find the magnitude of the acceleration.

http://dots.physics.orst.edu/graphics/image_maps/inclined_plane.gif


Homework Equations


magnitude of the acceleration of a block down a plane using rotated coordinates: a = g Sin[\Theta]
magnitude of the normal force: N = mg Cos[\Theta]


The Attempt at a Solution


The sum of the forces in the x direction only consist of the x component of the normal force on the block
\SigmaFx = Nx= -mgCos[\Theta]Cos[\Theta]
or Nx=-mgCos2\Theta=max
The extra cos theta exists because the magnitude of the normal force is mgCos[\Theta]
From this, ax= -gCos2\Theta
The sum of the forces in the y direction are the gravitational force and the y component of the normal force
\SigmaFy= -mg + mgCos[\Theta]Sin[\Theta]
From this, ay= -g+gCos\ThetaSin\Theta
or if you wish to apply the double angle formula:
ay= -g+1/2gSin[2\Theta]


Clearly these acceleration components do not give the correct value for the magnitude of the acceleration. A zero degree angle returns an acceleration in the -x direction equal to g. What did I miss?

PS. I apologize if there are any mistakes or this is hard to read. This is my first post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You messed up the calculation of the x & y components of the normal force. Note that the normal force makes an angle Θ with the vertical, not the horizontal.
 
Thanks for the reply. Careless errors like that can be so frustrating!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top