How Many Lines Per Millimeter Does the Diffraction Grating Have?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of lines per millimeter on a diffraction grating using the interference pattern created by light of 600 nm wavelength. The key formula involves the distance between slits, where lines per millimeter equals the inverse of this distance. A common misunderstanding arises when multiple slits are involved, leading to confusion about the spacing of maxima. The correct approach requires using the angles derived from the positions of the maxima to find the slit separation accurately. This problem frequently appears in homework, highlighting its relevance in physics education.
Ericv_91
Messages
25
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The figure shows the interference pattern on a screen 1.0 m behind a diffraction grating. The wavelength of the light is 600 nm. How many lines per millimeter does the grating have?


Homework Equations



lines/mm = 1/ distance between slits


The Attempt at a Solution


Quite frankly I don't have a clue how to solve this. I know that the number of lines per millimeter is equal to the inverse of the distance between slits, but what happens if there are more than 2 slits of different distances from each other? I took a shot in the dark and tried to add up the reciprocals of all the distances, but that proved to be incorrect because it gave me a very small number around 0.006. Does anyone have any helpful suggestions?
 

Attachments

  • Diffraction Grating.jpg
    Diffraction Grating.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 972
Physics news on Phys.org
Ericv_91 said:
Quite frankly I don't have a clue how to solve this. I know that the number of lines per millimeter is equal to the inverse of the distance between slits, but what happens if there are more than 2 slits of different distances from each other? I took a shot in the dark and tried to add up the reciprocals of all the distances, but that proved to be incorrect because it gave me a very small number around 0.006. Does anyone have any helpful suggestions?
It's hard to say where you went astray because you didn't show your work.

I'm guessing you used ##y_1=0.436~\rm m## and ##y_2=0.897~\rm m## and ended up getting to different answers for ##d##. The problem is that 0.897 m is the distance between the first- and second-order maxima, so you need to use ##y_2 ={0.897~\rm m}+y_1##.
 
I see @vela has already beaten me to it by 20 minutes or so. But given I’ve already drafted the following, I’ve decided to post it!

I think the OP (who will probably never read this thread) mistakenly thought that the uneven spacing of the maxima implied different line-spacings.
__________

This is a 12+ year old question, but in case the answer is of use to someone…

From the data in the Post #1 diagram:

The first order maximum makes an angle θ₁ with the normal, where ##θ₁ = tan⁻¹ (\frac {43.6}{100}) = 23.56º##.

The diffraction grating formula (nλ = dsinθ) with n=1 and θ = θ₁ gives:
##d = \frac {1*600e-9}{sin(23.56º)}##
If we express d in units of mm, then ‘lines/mm’ = ##\frac 1 d##.

To check this value, we can repeat the process using the second order maximum.

The second order maximum is a distance 89.7cm+43.6cm = 133.3cm from the axis. So ##θ₂ = tan⁻¹ (\frac {133.3}{100}) = 53.12º##.

Using ‘nλ = dsinθ’ with n=2 and θ = θ₂ will give the same value for ‘lines/mm’ as previously calculated.
 
To add to this, d is in m when you calculate it, so multiply the resulting d value by 1000 to convert to mm, then divide 1 by the result to get the answer. (I didn't see that part and was slightly confused)
 
Sanrasz said:
To add to this, d is in m when you calculate it, so multiply the resulting d value by 1000 to convert to mm, then divide 1 by the result to get the answer. (I didn't see that part and was slightly confused)
Thank you for your contribution. Please note that this thread is more than two years old. The OP is unlikely to profit from it at this point.
 
kuruman said:
Thank you for your contribution. Please note that this thread is more than two years old. The OP is unlikely to profit from it at this point.
I don't particularly care about the OP, but this question is actually extremely common in homework problems of the fifth edition of the book that OP's question is from. (And is exactly why I was reading this thread. Everything, down to the figure matches.)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top