Ranking velocities of particles in uniform magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
In a uniform magnetic field, five equal-mass particles (A–E) have their velocities ranked based on their trajectories, with A > B > C = E suggested due to their radii. Particle D, being neutral, does not follow a circular path, complicating the ranking since its velocity cannot be determined without charge information. The discussion emphasizes that the radius of a particle's trajectory is influenced by factors beyond speed, particularly charge. The conclusion drawn is that without knowing the charges of the particles, the problem remains unsolvable. Thus, assumptions about relative charge magnitudes can lead to incorrect interpretations of particle velocities.
Linus Pauling
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
1. Five equal-mass particles (A–E) enter a region of uniform magnetic field directed into the page. They follow the trajectories illustrated in the figure.

1011734.jpg


Rank from largest to smallest velocity




2. qvBsin(theta) = ma
qvB = ma = m(v^2/r)
v = qBr/m




3. Based on their radii, it should be A > B > C=E

But what about D? It is neutral, so has no radius because it doesn't go in a circle, but clearly has a velocity despite r = 0. Is the answer indeterminate, then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're meant to assume that all particles have the same charge; otherwise, the problem would be unsolvable. So assuming they have the same charge, D appears to go straight because it's barely affected by the magnetic field. What does that tell you about its velocity?
 
The answer actually was that it couldn't be determined.

Now I am asked to rank the speeds largest to smallest of A, B, C, and E. I thought it was clearly A > B > C=E, but it is not and it tells me this:

The radius of the trajectory of a particle depends on more than just its speed. Be sure not to make assumptions about the relative magnitudes of the charges.

WTF?
 
Linus Pauling said:
v = qBr/m

The velocity depends on the charge, and you are not given any information about the charges. Therefore the problem is not solvable.
 
nvmm
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top