Electric Field in an Infinitely Long Cylinder of Uniform Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving expressions for the electric field around an infinitely long cylinder with uniform positive charge density. For points outside the cylinder (r > R), the electric field is given by E = (ρR²)/(2ε₀r₁). For points inside the cylinder (r < R), the electric field is expressed as E = (Qr₂)/(2πε₀R²). The original poster seeks confirmation of their calculations and any corrections if necessary. Participants in the thread express appreciation for the review and confirm the calculations appear correct.
Dominguez Scaramanga
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I'm very sorry for my first two posts being rather long problems, but could any of you possibly give me a hand with the following...? :rolleyes:

the question is as follows;
"Consider an infinately long cyliner of radius R, and uniform positive charge per unit volume \rho. Derive expressions for the electric field (i) outside the cylinder r&gt;R, and (ii) inside the cylinder r&lt;R"

let me show you what I have...
I'll be calling r outside the cylinder r_{1} and inside r_{2}. also the length of the cylinder will be called l.

(i) for r&gt;R

\phi_{E}=\oint E\cdot dA = E2\pi r_{1}l
\phi_{E}=\frac{Q}{\varepsilon_{0}}
E=\frac{Q}{2\pi\varepsilon_{0} r_{1}l}

now Q=\rho\pi R^2 l

so E=\frac{\rho R^2}{2\varepsilon_{0} r_{1}}


(ii) for r&lt;R

\phi_{E}=\oint E\cdot dA = E2\pi r_{2}l
Q&#039; = \varepsilon_{0}\pi r_{2}^2 l = Q \frac{r_{2}^2}{R^2}

\Longrightarrow \frac{Q&#039;}{\varepsilon_{0}} = \frac{Qr_{2}^2}{\varepsilon_{0}R}

and finally, we have...

E=\frac{Qr_{2}}{2\pi\varepsilon_{0}R^2}


phew... sorry everything gets a bit tiny towards the end, I'm not sure how to change that :blush:

would someone be so kind as to confirm that this is correct for me? or, (in the likely event that), if it's wrong, offer some advice as to where I've gone wrong?

thank you all very much in advance :smile:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
for what it is worth

Dominguez Scaramanga said:
Hi everyone, I'm very sorry for my first two posts being rather long problems, but could any of you possibly give me a hand with the following...? :rolleyes:

the question is as follows;
"Consider an infinately long cyliner of radius R, and uniform positive charge per unit volume \rho. Derive expressions for the electric field (i) outside the cylinder r&gt;R, and (ii) inside the cylinder r&lt;R"

let me show you what I have...
I'll be calling r outside the cylinder r_{1} and inside r_{2}. also the length of the cylinder will be called l.

(i) for r&gt;R

\phi_{E}=\oint E\cdot dA = E2\pi r_{1}l
\phi_{E}=\frac{Q}{\varepsilon_{0}}
E=\frac{Q}{2\pi\varepsilon_{0} r_{1}l}

now Q=\rho\pi R^2 l

so E=\frac{\rho R^2}{2\varepsilon_{0} r_{1}}


(ii) for r&lt;R

\phi_{E}=\oint E\cdot dA = E2\pi r_{2}l
Q&#039; = \varepsilon_{0}\pi r_{2}^2 l = Q \frac{r_{2}^2}{R^2}

\Longrightarrow \frac{Q&#039;}{\varepsilon_{0}} = \frac{Qr_{2}^2}{\varepsilon_{0}R}

and finally, we have...

E=\frac{Qr_{2}}{2\pi\varepsilon_{0}R^2}


phew... sorry everything gets a bit tiny towards the end, I'm not sure how to change that :blush:

would someone be so kind as to confirm that this is correct for me? or, (in the likely event that), if it's wrong, offer some advice as to where I've gone wrong?

thank you all very much in advance :smile:

I gave it a quick once-over in my head, and it looks correct... but math in my head is not my strong point!
 
hey, thank you very much for giving it the once over though! it's very much appreciated :smile:
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top