Cart-Cart Collision, Conservation of Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a collision between two carts, emphasizing the conservation of momentum principle. After the collision, the 350 kg cart moves at a speed of 10.4 m/s. An observer moving at 12 m/s sees the initial and final velocities of the carts as 12 m/s, -12 m/s, 16 m/s, and -1.6 m/s, respectively. Participants express confusion about calculating total momentum from the observer's perspective, questioning if it should be zero. The consensus is that momentum remains conserved regardless of the observer's motion, and calculations should confirm this.
pleasehelpme6
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cart (m1 = 130 kg) is moving to the right along a track at v1i = 24 m/s when it hits a stationary cart (m2 = 350 kg) and rebounds with a speed of v1f = 4 m/s in the opposite direction.

a) With what speed does the 350 kg cart move after the collision?
A: 10.4 m/s

An observer moves in the same direction as the incoming cart with a speed of 12 m/s.
Using the convention that the positive direction is to the right, what are the following velocities with respect to this observer:

b) v1i, ob... A: 12
c) v2i, ob... A: -12
d) v1f, ob... A: 16
e) v2f, ob... A: -1.6

This is the annoying part...

f) What is the total momentum of the system before the collision as seen by this moving observer?

g) What is the total momentum of the system after the collision as seen by this same observer?

Homework Equations



m1v1 = m2v2

Any thoughts on how to solve this? I'm a little lost.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about 1. the definition of momentum, and 2. conservation of momentum. :smile:
 
yeah i tried using conservation of momentum but the answers I am getting don't make sense to me. the equation doesn't even out.

the way i think of it, from a stand-still perspective, the net momentum is 0, so if youre moving at 12 m/s, shouldn't the net momentum look like -12 m/s?

i tried using the new velocities in the m1v1 = m2v2 equation, but i think i must be setting it up wrong somehow. any suggestions?
 
Perhaps this diagram http://yfrog.com/45pf2cj will help somewhat (sorry it's somewhat crudely been done in MS Paint) :smile:

Surely the momentum should always be the same, regardless of whether the observer is moving or not, right?! :wink:

If you take the definition:

m_{1}v_{1i}+m_{2}v_{2i} = m_{1}v_{2i}+m_{2}v_{2f}[/itex]<br /> <br /> Using all the values calculated in the first part, you should find that both sides of the equation are equal, hence momentum is conserved.<br /> <br /> Now if you also alternatively use the values calculated in respect to the observer, you should find that again both sides of the equation are equal and hence momentum conserved.<br /> <br /> Try doing those, and post you&#039;re calculations if you still have any problems. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":smile:" title="Smile :smile:" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":smile:" />
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top