What are complex functions and how can they be graphed?

AI Thread Summary
Complex functions operate on complex numbers, which can be represented in both rectangular (Cartesian) and polar forms. The polar representation, r*e^(i*theta), illustrates the magnitude and angle of the complex number in the x-y plane. While complex numbers can be graphed as points in two dimensions, complex functions require two input dimensions and cannot be represented in a standard two-dimensional graph. If a complex function outputs a real number, it can be visualized as a surface in three dimensions. Understanding these representations is crucial for grasping the behavior of complex functions.
madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1
I know that a complex number can be written in form of a+bi and r(cos(theta) + isin(theta))
but I don't understand the the representation of it as r*e^(i * theta) also
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
uhm so since I like things by examples tell me if I got it right
5+2i
in polar form its
5.4 (isin(tan^-1(2/5)+.cos(tan^-1(2/5)
and it could be written as 5.4e^(i*tan^-1(2/5))?
 
Yeah! that's exactly right.

If you imagine that complex numbers are a position in the x-y plane, where the x-axis is real numbers and the y-axis is imaginary numbers; then a+ib is just a standard rectilinear (Cartesian) way of describing a point [e.g. 5+2i = 5x + 2y = (5,2) ]; when you use r*e^{i\theta}, its like writing it in polar coordinates, r is the magnitude, and theta the angle with the x-axis.
 
zhermes said:
Yeah! that's exactly right.

If you imagine that complex numbers are a position in the x-y plane, where the x-axis is real numbers and the y-axis is imaginary numbers; then a+ib is just a standard rectilinear (Cartesian) way of describing a point [e.g. 5+2i = 5x + 2y = (5,2) ]; when you use r*e^{i\theta}, its like writing it in polar coordinates, r is the magnitude, and theta the angle with the x-axis.

is it possible with the rectangular coordinate to graph a complex function? I searched the net but couldn't figure out the right key words I mean like f(x)=2x+2ix and you input (2-i) and get 6+2i or does no such thing exist in mathematics?
 
madah12 said:
I mean like f(x)=2x+2ix and you input (2-i) and get 6+2i or does no such thing exist in mathematics?
"Complex functions" are the general term for functions which operate on (or yield) complex numbers. But note, you have to input two scalars (the equivalent of a complex number)
<br /> z = f(x+iy)<br /> [\tex]<br /> You, therefore, can&#039;t graph such functions in 2 dimensions, because you have 2 input dimensions (e.g. x and y) and then output dimensions (1 if your result is a real number, and 2 if your result is a complex number).<br /> <br /> If you have a function which takes a complex number and gives a real number, you could plot it as a surface in 3 dimensions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
3
Replies
108
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Back
Top