Where Did I Go Wrong in Deriving Gravitational Potential Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving gravitational potential energy from Newton's law using vector calculus. The user attempts to integrate the gravitational force but ends up with a result that is three times larger than expected. A key error identified is in the substitution step, where the differential change in a multi-variable function was incorrectly simplified. The correct approach involves acknowledging that the total differential should account for all components of the vector. The user acknowledges the need for a better understanding of multivariable calculus to resolve the issue.
Dead Boss
Messages
150
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Derive the gravitational potential energy from Newton's law.

Homework Equations



<br /> \mathbf{F} = -G \frac{m_1m_2}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|^3} \mathbf{r}<br />

<br /> W = \int_A^B \mathbf{F} \cdot{} d\mathbf{r}<br />

<br /> \Delta{}U = W<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I can use the scalar version of the law, but I want to do it with the vector form.
So, first some easy substitution:

<br /> W = \int_A^B \mathbf{F} \cdot{} d\mathbf{r} <br /> = -Gm_1m_2 \int_A^B \frac{\mathbf{r}\cdot{}d\mathbf{r}}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|^3}<br /> = Gm_1m_2 \int_A^B \frac{r_xdr_x + r_ydr_y + r_zdr_z}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|^3}<br />

<br /> = -Gm_1m_2 \left\{<br /> \int_A^B \frac{r_x}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|^3} dr_x +<br /> \int_A^B \frac{r_y}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|^3} dr_y +<br /> \int_A^B \frac{r_z}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|^3} dr_z<br /> \right\}<br />

Now take one integrand, for example the x part,

<br /> \int_A^B \frac{r_x}{\sqrt{r_x^2 + r_y^2 + r_z^2}^3} dr_x =<br /> \int_A^B r_x \left( r_x^2 + r_y^2 + r_z^2 \right)^{-\frac{3}{2}} dr_x<br />

and perform substitution:

<br /> t = r_x^2 + r_y^2 + r_z^2<br />
<br /> dt = 2r_x dr_x<br />
<br /> \frac{dt}{2} = r_x dr_x<br />

That yields:

<br /> \frac{1}{2} \int_A^B t^{-\frac{3}{2}} dt_x =<br /> \left[ -t^{-\frac{1}{2}} \right]_A^B =<br /> \left[ -\frac{1}{\sqrt{r_x^2 + r_y^2 + r_z^2}} \right]_A^B =<br /> \left[ -\frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|} \right]_A^B =<br /> -\left( \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{B}\right|} - \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{A}\right|} \right)<br />

Doing the same for other two integrands and plunging them back:

<br /> W = -Gm_1m_2 \left\{<br /> -\left( \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{B}\right|} - \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{A}\right|} \right)<br /> -\left( \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{B}\right|} - \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{A}\right|} \right)<br /> -\left( \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{B}\right|} - \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{A}\right|} \right)<br /> \right\}<br />

And finally

<br /> W = 3Gm_1m_2 \left(<br /> \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{B}\right|} - \frac{1}{\left|\mathbf{A}\right|}<br /> \right)<br />

Now if we take B at infinity, the potential energy will be

<br /> U = - 3G\frac{m_1m_2}{\left|\mathbf{r}\right|}<br />

which is three times as large as it should be. Don't tell me, let me guess. There's an error somewhere up there. *sigh*
Any help would be highly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is where you were wrong:
<br /> <br /> dt = 2r_x dr_x<br /> <br />

t is a multi-variable function, therefore: dt = 2r_xdr_x+2r_ydr_y+2r_zdr_z

A suggestion: 2\vec{r}d\vec{r} = d(\vec{r}^2) = d(r^2)
 
Thanks, hikaru!
I knew I should have read that book about multivariable calculus.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top