Rigorous Introductory physics textbook

AI Thread Summary
An inquiry into finding a mathematically rigorous introductory physics textbook highlights a dissatisfaction with common texts that lack precision in their mathematical treatment. The discussion suggests alternatives that align with a mathematical background, including "Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics" by V.I. Arnold for classical mechanics, "Lectures on Quantum Theory: Mathematical and Structural Foundations" by Chris Isham for quantum mechanics, and "The Geometry of Minkowski Spacetime" by Gregory Naber for special relativity. These recommendations emphasize clarity and correctness in mathematical concepts, catering to those who prioritize rigorous approaches in their study of physics.
Riemannliness
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering if anybody knows about or has used a good introductory physics textbook that is mathematically rigorous. I'm really interested in physics, but I'm a mathematics student and I CAN'T STAND any of the books I've tried to use so far (eg. Knight's Physics). I've really grown to dislike texts that continually do things that are mathematically sketchy (or outright incorrect) but are "good enough for the purposes/scope/level of this textbook".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know any book that fits that description, but there are a few about specific areas of physics that you might like, for example "Mathematical methods of classical mechanics", by V.I. Arnold. For quantum mechanics, you might like "Lectures on quantum theory: Mathematical and structural foundations", by Chris Isham. It's supposed to be a fairly easy read, so it's not exactly filled with rigorous proofs, but it's at least not giving you the wrong ideas about anything. For special relativity, consider "The geometry of Minkowski spacetime", by Gregory Naber.
 

Thread '"WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians'

The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
View full post »

Thread 'Books with a more theoretical approach to turbulence and DNS'

I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
View full post »

Similar threads

Quantum Introductory quantum mechanics textbook for self-study
Replies
13
Views
4K
Intro Physics Introductory physics textbook for a math student
Replies
10
Views
3K
Number Theory Can anyone recommend me a textbook for Number Theory (Undergraduate)?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Applied A question about mathematics textbooks for physicists
Replies
34
Views
6K
Classical What Are the Best Introductory Textbooks for a Self-Studying Physics Enthusiast?
Replies
25
Views
10K
Topics in Young & Friedman's University Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Classical Looking for introductory level physics textbook
Replies
10
Views
3K
Intro Physics How useful is the "with Modern Physics" section of Tipler's Physics?
Replies
7
Views
3K
Classical Calculus-based physics textbooks
Replies
3
Views
3K
Calculus Comparing "Calculus" and "Early Transcendentals" Textbooks for MST124
Replies
22
Views
9K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top