Potential energy of a charge system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of potential energy in a system of charges, specifically in the context of electromagnetism for aerospace engineering. A newcomer to the forum seeks clarification on a statement from their textbook regarding the symmetry of potential energy in charge systems. The key point is that potential energy is defined for a system rather than individual charges. It emphasizes that the formula for potential energy is symmetric, meaning it does not differentiate between charges, indicating that potential energy is a characteristic of the entire system. This symmetry reinforces the idea that potential energy cannot be attributed to a single particle but rather to the interactions within a group of charges. The discussion concludes with the newcomer expressing understanding of this concept.
agolkar
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm new to the forum and I congratulate with everyone of here for the nice scientific forum you've set up :smile:
I apologize in advance for my poor english (especially about scientific terms!), but I hope I can explain my doubt. I'm currently studying for the Electromagnetism exam for my aerospace engineering degree.

After the enunciation of the formula of the potential energy for a charge system (U=1/2 1/(4*pi*epsilon) etc..), in my book I read the following statement about the topic in subject:

"it comes back the simmetric structure regarding the charges, that corresponds the fact that the potential energy of a charge system in every possible configuration is a characteristic of the system in its complex".

The original text in italian is the following (for the curious ones :biggrin: ):

"torna di nuovo la struttura simmetrica rispetto alle cariche, che
corrisponde all'essere l'energia potenziale di un sistema di cariche in ogni
sua possibile configurazione una caratteristica del sistema nel suo insieme


The same assertion about the symmetry regarding the charges is made when introducting the potential energy itself... anyway I cannot understand the point :frown: can someone help me, please?

Thanks in advance :smile:
Alessandro
 
Physics news on Phys.org
electric potential energy

Well, if I understand what you meant, here is the answer.

The author is trying to say that the potential energy is defined only for a system. For example, potential energy of a group of charges, potential energy of the earth-stone system. You can't say potential energy of the electron, rather, potenitial energy of the electron-proton system.

I hope it helps. Tell me if you meant something else.


spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
thank you for your answer :)
yes, i think that's the point.
but i cannot understand the relation of it with the symmetry of the formula regarding the charges... any idea?

thanks again :smile:
 
symmetry and Electric potential energy

Agolkar,

If you look at the formula, you observe that by looking at it, you cannot tell whether you have written the potential energy of Particle A or Particle B.
That is, the formula is symmetric with A and B. ( or with all the charges if there are many ).

So, that means, potential energy is not for a particle. Rather, for a system. And the formula tells that too.

spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
thanks! :cool: i understood!
very clever :smile:
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top