Weight distribution, multiple points of contact

AI Thread Summary
Calculating normal forces for a vehicle with three contact points can be challenging due to the lack of sufficient equations. When balancing forces and torques, having three points typically requires an additional equation to solve for the unknowns. If the contact points are collinear, an equation regarding the rigidity of the body may be necessary. However, if the points are not in a straight line, the existing equations might suffice unless there are four contact points. Understanding the geometry and rigidity of the vehicle is crucial for accurate calculations.
Gunnar Larsso
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

I am struggling with calculating the normal forces for a vehicle that is in contact with the ground at three places (scoop, front wheels, rare wheels).

To calculate the normal forces with two locations (such as front and rare wheel) it is just to balance the forces as well as the torque giving you two equations and two unknowns.

However, with three locations I am one equation short.. Having tried to calculate the torque around all locations I have realized that doing so provide no extra information (i.e. just get back the same equation for angular momentum independent of location or 0=0 after some manipulation). I have the feeling that I have missed something basic, fundamental and simple, but just can't figure out what.. How do I find that extra equation needed to solve the problem? Any help would be deeply appreciated!

Regards,
Gunnar
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hello Gunnar! Welcome to PF! :smile:

If the three contact points are in a straight line, then yes you need another equation (probably one describing how much the "rigid" body bends).

If they're not in a line, then no, but you would need another equation for four points. :wink:
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Torque required from powered roller to rotate cylinder
Replies
19
Views
2K
I How can you make a free body diagram for someone running then sliding?
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Motorcycle model and tire force
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Will This Friction Clamp Hold the Weight?
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Solving Wheel Coming to a Stop: FBD, Friction & Hysteresis
Replies
22
Views
4K
I Question about an example in Newton's Principia
Replies
1
Views
1K
I What is the acceleration at the contact point between a wheel and surface?
Replies
17
Views
3K
Can Weight Transfer Cause a Car to Stay in a Stuck Position?
Replies
14
Views
3K
Does MTB rider position affect bike cornering traction?
Replies
27
Views
4K
B Questions about momentum and force as well as normal force/friction
Replies
35
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top