Difference between Tensile Force and Tension

AI Thread Summary
Tension refers to the force experienced by a string or bar that is being pulled at both ends, while tensile force is the actual measurement of that force. When a weight is hung from a bar, the tensile force is equal to the weight, but stress also depends on the bar's cross-sectional area. The discussion highlights that tension and tensile force are often used interchangeably, but the former is more about the condition of being stretched, while the latter quantifies the force itself. In free body diagrams, it is important to accurately represent where forces are applied, particularly in relation to massless strings. Ultimately, it is more precise to say there is a tensile force acting on the bar due to the tension in the string.
GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0
What is the difference? If I recall someone telling me there's no sense thing as a force called tension and that the proper term is tensile force but it's all fuzzy at the moment. Does anyone know the difference between the two and can explain?

Thanks, in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tension is normally talked of in terms of stress. Tensile force is, well, a force. If you hang a 10N weight on the end of a metal bar, you've applied a 10N tensile force but the stress depends on the cross sectional area of the bar.
 
Ah so like when in the case of the metal bar, if i were to hang the metal bar up onto the ceiling by a string, the force exerted on the string as a opposite in direction and equal in magnitude to the force of gravity acting on the bar would be 10 N of a tensile force or 10 N of a tension force upwards?
 
GreenPrint said:
What is the difference? If I recall someone telling me there's no sense thing as a force called tension and that the proper term is tensile force but it's all fuzzy at the moment. Does anyone know the difference between the two and can explain?

Thanks, in advance

I think the difference between tension and tensile force may be similar to the difference between weight and the weight force.

When a string/bar/rod is under tension, it means forces is trying to stretch that string/bar/rod - it is being pulled at each end. The tensile Force is the size of the forces trying to stretch it.

Similarly, when a mass is placed in a gravitational field it will have weight. Here on Earth, the weight force of a 2 kg mass is about 19.6 N

Peter
 
I'm thinking I'm understanding now. So which is more proper to say? I have a feeling the second one but not sure.

There are 10 N of tension acting on the bar.

There are 10 N of a tensile force acting on bar.

When describing the force that's equal in magnitude but opposite in direction of the force of gravity acting on the bar? Also when we assume that the string is a mass less object of a negligible mass aren't we assuming that the string is just some sort of extension of the object that can be considered part of the object but has no mass? So then is it technically improper to draw on a free body diagram the uh... tensile force/force of tension... which ever is more proper? as being directly upwards out of the object... shouldn't it be at the top of the string that's holding the object in air sense it's considered as some massless entity that's just a extension of the object?
 
GreenPrint said:
I'm thinking I'm understanding now. So which is more proper to say? I have a feeling the second one but not sure.

There are 10 N of tension acting on the bar.

There are 10 N of a tensile force acting on bar.

When describing the force that's equal in magnitude but opposite in direction of the force of gravity acting on the bar? Also when we assume that the string is a mass less object of a negligible mass aren't we assuming that the string is just some sort of extension of the object that can be considered part of the object but has no mass? So then is it technically improper to draw on a free body diagram the uh... tensile force/force of tension... which ever is more proper? as being directly upwards out of the object... shouldn't it be at the top of the string that's holding the object in air sense it's considered as some massless entity that's just a extension of the object?

Due to tension in the string, the string pulls up on the bar, and pulls down on the ceiling.
Those two forces are not a Newton's Third law couple however - despite being equal in size and opposite in direction. the couples would be.

The Earth pulls down on the bar (1) , the bar pulls up on the Earth (2)
The bar pulls down on the string (3), the string pulls up on the bar (4)
The string pulls down on the ceiling (5), the ceiling pulls up on the string (6).

In a diagram, not all of those forces are drawn in. You may be considering only the forces acting on the bar [2 & 3] for example.

Forces 1 & 2 are drawn with arrows starting at the centre of mass of the Earth / Bar.

Forces 3 - 6 are drawn with arrows starting at the points of contact between the two bodies.

Peter
 
so would it be more proper to say that there are 10 N of tension acting on the bar exerted by the string or that there's 10 N of tensile force acting on the bar exerted by the string?
 
GreenPrint said:
so would it be more proper to say that there are 10 N of tension acting on the bar exerted by the string or that there's 10 N of tensile force acting on the bar exerted by the string?

I would say "Due to Tension in the string there is a 10N force acting on the bar".
 
Back
Top