Hi, quick problem regarding emission of gamma ray.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the recoil speed of a Fe (57) nucleus after it emits a gamma ray during its decay from an excited state. Initially, there is confusion regarding the momentum of photons, as they are massless yet still possess momentum defined by the equation p = E/c. Participants clarify that conservation of momentum can be applied, leading to the realization that the recoil velocity can be approximated using this principle. The problem becomes straightforward once the correct relationship between photon energy and momentum is acknowledged. Ultimately, the user successfully solves the problem by applying these concepts.
teclo
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
A Fe (57) atom is in an excited state 14.4 keV above the ground state. The nucleus decays to the ground state with the emission of a gamm ray. What's the recoil speed of the nucleus?

I'm not sure how to set this up. I thought a photon would have no mass, therefor no momentum. If so I couldn't do this with conservation of momenumtum or energy. I must be missing something, anyone have any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The closest thing my book has to a simliar example is dealing with the Rutherford experiement.

K(1) + 0 = K(3) + K(4)

so i would think that the initial energy of the atom equals the energy of the photon plus the energy of the atom after emission. I'm not sure about how to setup something like this though.
 
teclo said:
I thought a photon would have no mass, therefor no momentum.
Despite being massless, photons do have momentum: p = E/c.
 
teclo said:
A Fe (57) atom is in an excited state 14.4 keV above the ground state. The nucleus decays to the ground state with the emission of a gamm ray. What's the recoil speed of the nucleus?

I'm not sure how to set this up. I thought a photon would have no mass, therefor no momentum. If so I couldn't do this with conservation of momenumtum or energy. I must be missing something, anyone have any ideas?

A photon DOES have a momentum.

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Photon.html

Even the classical version of light as EM radiation has something called "radiation pressure".

So, knowing this, can you now do the problem?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
A photon DOES have a momentum.

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Photon.html

Even the classical version of light as EM radiation has something called "radiation pressure".

So, knowing this, can you now do the problem?

Zz.

yes, acutally i worked the problem out earlier. i forgot that p of the photon is E/c.

with that it was rather easy to approximate the recoil velocity of the nucleus using conservation of momentum. if reference frame observes initial excited nucleus as v of 0

0 = mv + E/c

i was making this harder than it really was
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'

Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'

The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
View full post »
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'

Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'

I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
View full post »

Similar threads

How to calculate gamma ray energies following beta decay?
Replies
12
Views
1K
Energy of the photon emitted in a gamma ray decay
Replies
19
Views
3K
B Prevalence of nuclear decays accompanied by gamma emission
Replies
1
Views
1K
A Why KE of Annihilation Electrons Differs?
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Beta and gamma rays from radium
Replies
1
Views
2K
I How to read this decay sheet (gamma emission after beta decay)
Replies
4
Views
2K
A Beta/gamma decay probabilities
Replies
2
Views
2K
Estimating the energy of an emitted photon in gamma decay
Replies
5
Views
2K
Caesium 137 is an unstable isomer
Replies
13
Views
3K
Gamma ray irradiation and a shielded chamber question
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top