Is Work Required to Push Electrons from Positive to Negative Terminal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peter G.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity Work
AI Thread Summary
Electrons must be pushed from the positive to the negative terminal of a battery, which requires work due to the potential difference. This movement is influenced by conventional current flow, where the positive terminal has a higher potential. The chemical reactions within the battery facilitate the movement of electrons, requiring energy input. As electrons flow back through the circuit, energy is released. The electromotive force (e.m.f) represents the work done per unit charge, equating to the potential difference across the battery.
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

My book says the electrons must be pushed from the positive to the negative terminal, which means work must be done on the electrons.

I find it a bit confusing. Is the book saying that because we are using the conventional current? Meaning that the positive end of the battery has a high potential and the left end a lower potential hence charge must flow from positive to negative. Then in that case, work would have to be done on the charges (electrons) to make them move against the forces of attraction, since, normally, electrons would move the other way?

Thanks,
Peter G.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a battery for example the chemical reaction inside moves electrons from + to -. That requires energy. That energy is then released again as the electrons move back through the circuit.
 
Ok and just one more thing: The e.m.f, that is, the work done per unit charge to move it around the circuit is actually the potential difference across the battery (therefore E.m.f - Ir)?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top