How does induced charge separation work and why can it be confusing?

AI Thread Summary
Induced charge separation occurs when a charged object, like a negative rod, influences the distribution of charges in nearby materials, leading to a separation of positive and negative charges. In the first scenario with a hanging ball, the negative rod attracts positive charges closer while repelling negative charges away, resulting in a net positive charge on one side of the ball. In the second scenario with an electroscope, the negative rod similarly attracts positive charges into the ball and pushes negative charges onto the leaves, causing them to repel each other. The confusion arises from the mixed representation of positive and negative charges, as well as the grounding aspect, which is not clearly defined. Understanding that atomic nuclei are fixed and only electrons move helps clarify the concept of induced charge separation.
whoareyou
Messages
162
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



I am having trouble understanding the concept of induced charge separation. In my textbook, there is a diagram that demonstrates the procedure, but it gets confusing because the first image is normal, and then it gets inverted? I don't understand in the second set-up if it is being grounded or not.

34jgO.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first image is for a hanging ball. The second is for an electroscope with a ball attached to two leaves, which are repelling. They are both confusing because they show + and - charges mixed together - which is reality, but still confusing. I have simplified it to make it clearer:
electroscope.jpg

On the left, the negative rod has pulled some positive charges on the ball closer and pushed some negative ones away to the other side. induced charge separation, pushing some negative charges (electrons) away and leaving some atoms with a net positive charge nearby.

On the right, the negative rod has pulled positive charges up into the ball, and negative ones down pushed some negative charges (electrons) down onto the leaves (which then repel each other). Of course there are many charges of both kinds all over the place and not shown for clarity.

---
[edit: Text modified by moderator (blue text) to reflect the fact that in most common materials, especially solids, atomic nuclei are the source of the positive charges and are fixed in place for all practical purposes and only the electrons have the luxury of mobility. The electrons can leave behind atoms with a net positive charge. The story is different for other forms of matter where the atoms themselves are mobile, such as liquids, gases, and plasmas]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top