Reflection of a plane mirror and phase shift

AI Thread Summary
A linearly polarized beam reflecting off a plane mirror with a higher index does not change the direction of its polarization due to the 180-degree phase shift. However, the reflection coefficients differ for waves polarized in the plane of incidence versus those perpendicular to it, leading to changes in the ratio of these components. When both components are present, the polarization direction can change upon reflection. In the case of metal mirrors and non-normal incidence, the situation becomes more complex, resulting in elliptically polarized light. Fresnel's equations provide insight into these phenomena, particularly regarding phase shifts and polarization changes.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

I think I have confused myself: If I have a linearly polarized beam incident on a plane mirror with higher index, will the 180-degree phase shift change the direction of the polarization? Say, from lying in the 1st-3rd quadrant to lying in the 2nd-4th quadrant? Personally I would say no, since the mirror has no way to "tell" what the 1st-3rd quadrant actually is. But I am not 100% sure my argument works.


Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pi phase change during reflection does not change the direction of polarization.
But: the coefficient of reflection is different for waves polarized in the plane of incidence and for those, perpendicular to the plane(TM and TE mode waves).
If the incident wave has both parallel and perpendicular components, the ratio of the components will change upon reflection, and so does the direction of polarization.
When the mirror is from metal, the situation is even more complicated at non-normal incidence, as not only the amplitudes of the wave components change but their phases, too. Therefore the reflected light becomes elliptically polarized.

ehild
 
Hi

Thanks, do you have a reference where these things are explained?Niles.
 
It is any handbook of Optics, O.S. Heavens, Optical Properties of Thin Films, Academic Press, 1955, for example. Google "Fresnel coefficients", "polarization of light by reflection".

ehild
 
Hi again

Ok, so from Fresnel's equations I see that the component perpendicular to the plane of incidence gets an additional phase of 180 degrees upon reflection. That means that there is a net relative change between the components of 180 degrees upon reflection. But this is practically just what a half-wave plate does?

Where am I wrong here?
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top